SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · cs/0211025

Effective Strong Dimension, Algorithmic Information, and Computational Complexity

Abstract

The two most important notions of fractal dimension are {\it Hausdorff dimension}, developed by Hausdorff (1919), and {\it packing dimension}, developed by Tricot (1982). Lutz (2000) has recently proven a simple characterization of Hausdorff dimension in terms of {\it gales}, which are betting strategies that generalize martingales. Imposing various computability and complexity constraints on these gales produces a spectrum of effective versions of Hausdorff dimension. In this paper we show that packing dimension can also be characterized in terms of gales. Moreover, even though the usual definition of packing dimension is considerably more complex than that of Hausdorff dimension, our gale characterization of packing dimension is an exact dual of -- and every bit as simple as -- the gale characterization of Hausdorff dimension. Effectivizing our gale characterization of packing dimension produces a variety of {\it effective strong dimensions}, which are exact duals of the effective dimensions mentioned above. We develop the basic properties of effective strong dimensions and prove a number of results relating them to fundamental aspects of randomness, Kolmogorov complexity, prediction, Boolean circuit-size complexity, polynomial-time degrees, and data compression.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Krishna B. Athreya, John M. Hitchcock, Jack H. Lutz, Elvira Mayordomo. 2003-01-06. Effective Strong Dimension, Algorithmic Information, and Computational Complexity. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0211025

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC