SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · cs/0502068

Limits of Rush Hour Logic Complexity

Abstract

Rush Hour Logic was introduced in [Flake&Baum99] as a model of computation inspired by the ``Rush Hour'' toy puzzle, in which cars can move horizontally or vertically within a parking lot. The authors show how the model supports polynomial space computation, using certain car configurations as building blocks to construct boolean circuits for a cpu and memory. They consider the use of cars of length 3 crucial to their construction, and conjecture that cars of size 2 only, which we'll call `Size 2 Rush Hour', do not support polynomial space computation. We settle this conjecture by showing that the required building blocks are constructible in Size 2 Rush Hour. Furthermore, we consider Unit Rush Hour, which was hitherto believed to be trivial, show its relation to maze puzzles, and provide empirical support for its hardness.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

John Tromp, Rudi Cilibrasi. 2005-02-15. Limits of Rush Hour Logic Complexity. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0502068

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC