SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · cs/0606001

Tight Bounds for the Min-Max Boundary Decomposition Cost of Weighted Graphs

Abstract

Many load balancing problems that arise in scientific computing applications ask to partition a graph with weights on the vertices and costs on the edges into a given number of almost equally-weighted parts such that the maximum boundary cost over all parts is small. Here, this partitioning problem is considered for bounded-degree graphs G=(V,E) with edge costs c: E->R+ that have a p-separator theorem for some p>1, i.e., any (arbitrarily weighted) subgraph of G can be separated into two parts of roughly the same weight by removing a vertex set S such that the edges incident to S in the subgraph have total cost at most proportional to (SUM_e c^p_e)^(1/p), where the sum is over all edges e in the subgraph. We show for all positive integers k and weights w that the vertices of G can be partitioned into k parts such that the weight of each part differs from the average weight by less than MAX{w_v; v in V}, and the boundary edges of each part have cost at most proportional to (SUM_e c_e^p/k)^(1/p) + MAX_e c_e. The partition can be computed in time nearly proportional to the time for computing a separator S of G. Our upper bound on the boundary costs is shown to be tight up to a constant factor for infinitely many instances with a broad range of parameters. Previous results achieved this bound only if one has c=1, w=1, and one allows parts with weight exceeding the average by a constant fraction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David Steurer. 2006-06-01. Tight Bounds for the Min-Max Boundary Decomposition Cost of Weighted Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0606001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS