Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · cs/0611114

Very Sparse Stable Random Projections, Estimators and Tail Bounds for Stable Random Projections

Ping Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper will focus on three different aspects in improving the current practice of stable random projections. Firstly, we propose {\em very sparse stable random projections} to significantly reduce the processing and storage cost, by replacing the $α$-stable distribution with a mixture of a symmetric $α$-Pareto distribution (with probability $β$, $0<β\leq1$) and a point mass at the origin (with a probability $1-β$). This leads to a significant $\frac{1}β$-fold speedup for small $β$. Secondly, we provide an improved estimator for recovering the original $l_α$ norms from the projected data. The standard estimator is based on the (absolute) sample median, while we suggest using the geometric mean. The geometric mean estimator we propose is strictly unbiased and is easier to study. Moreover, the geometric mean estimator is more accurate, especially non-asymptotically. Thirdly, we provide an adequate answer to the basic question of how many projections (samples) are needed for achieving some pre-specified level of accuracy. \cite{Proc:Indyk_FOCS00,Article:Indyk_TKDE03} did not provide a criterion that can be used in practice. The geometric mean estimator we propose allows us to derive sharp tail bounds which can be expressed in exponential forms with constants explicitly given.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.ITcs.LGmath.IT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ping Li. 2006-12-01. Very Sparse Stable Random Projections, Estimators and Tail Bounds for Stable Random Projections. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0611114

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗