SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · cs/9907015

Linear-Time Approximation Algorithms for Computing Numerical Summation with Provably Small Errors

Abstract

Given a multiset $X=\{x_1,..., x_n\}$ of real numbers, the {\it floating-point set summation} problem asks for $S_n=x_1+...+x_n$. Let $E^*_n$ denote the minimum worst-case error over all possible orderings of evaluating $S_n$. We prove that if $X$ has both positive and negative numbers, it is NP-hard to compute $S_n$ with the worst-case error equal to $E^*_n$. We then give the first known polynomial-time approximation algorithm that has a provably small error for arbitrary $X$. Our algorithm incurs a worst-case error at most $2(\mix)E^*_n$.\footnote{All logarithms $\log$ in this paper are base 2.} After $X$ is sorted, it runs in O(n) time. For the case where $X$ is either all positive or all negative, we give another approximation algorithm with a worst-case error at most $\lceil\log\log n\rceil E^*_n$. Even for unsorted $X$, this algorithm runs in O(n) time. Previously, the best linear-time approximation algorithm had a worst-case error at most $\lceil\log n\rceil E^*_n$, while $E^*_n$ was known to be attainable in $O(n \log n)$ time using Huffman coding.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ming-Yang Kao, Jie Wang. 1999-07-09. Linear-Time Approximation Algorithms for Computing Numerical Summation with Provably Small Errors. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9907015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS