arXiv · gr-qc/9704048
Should Metric Signature Matter in Clifford Algebra Formulations of Physical Theories?
Abstract
Standard formulation is unable to distinguish between the (+++-) and (---+) spacetime metric signatures. However, the Clifford algebras associated with each are inequivalent, R(4) in the first case (real 4 by 4 matrices), H(2) in the latter (quaternionic 2 by 2). Multivector reformulations of Dirac theory by various authors look quite inequivalent pending the algebra assumed. It is not clear if this is mere artifact, or if there is a right/wrong choice as to which one describes reality. However, recently it has been shown that one can map from one signature to the other using a "tilt transformation" [see P. Lounesto, "Clifford Algebras and Hestenes Spinors", Found. Phys. 23, 1203-1237 (1993)]. The broader question is that if the universe is signature blind, then perhaps a complete theory should be manifestly tilt covariant. A generalized multivector wave equation is proposed which is fully signature invariant in form, because it includes all the components of the algebra in the wavefunction (instead of restricting it to half) as well as all the possibilities for interaction terms.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
William M. Pezzaglia Jr., John J. Adams. 1997-04-17. Should Metric Signature Matter in Clifford Algebra Formulations of Physical Theories?. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9704048
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.