arXiv · hep-ph/0609100
A Comparison of two different jet algorithms for the top mass reconstruction at the LHC
Abstract
We compare the abilities of the cluster-type jet algorithm, KtJet, and a mid-point iterating cone algorithm to reconstruct the top mass at the LHC. We discuss the information contained in the merging scales of cluster-type algorithms, and how this can be used in experimental analyses, as well as the different sources of systematic errors for the two algorithms. We find that the sources of systematic error are different for the two algorithms, which may help to better constrain the systematic error on the top mass at the LHC.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Michael H. Seymour, Christopher Tevlin. 2006-10-19. A Comparison of two different jet algorithms for the top mass reconstruction at the LHC. https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708%2F2006%2F11%2F052
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.