arXiv · hep-th/0610328
What Does(n't) K-theory Classify?
Abstract
We review various K-theory classification conjectures in string theory. Sen conjecture based proposals classify D-brane trajectories in backgrounds with no H flux, while Freed-Witten anomaly based proposals classify conserved RR charges and magnetic RR fluxes in topologically time-independent backgrounds. In exactly solvable CFTs a classification of well-defined boundary states implies that there are branes representing every twisted K-theory class. Some of these proposals fail to respect the self-duality of the RR fields in the democratic formulation of type II supergravity and none respect S-duality in type IIB string theory. We discuss two applications. The twisted K-theory classification has led to a conjecture for the topology of the T-dual of any configuration. In the Klebanov-Strassler geometry twisted K-theory classifies universality classes of baryonic vacua.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Jarah Evslin. 2006-10-31. What Does(n't) K-theory Classify?. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0610328
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.