arXiv · hep-th/9304093
Reply to `Comment on Gravity and the Poincare' Group'
Abstract
In the first order form, the model considered by Strobl presents, besides local Lorentz and diffeomorphism invariances, an additional local non-linear symmetry. When the model is realized as a Poincaré gauge theory according to the procedure outlined in Refs.[1,2], the generators of the non-linear symmetry are responsible for the ``nasty constraint algebra''. We show that not only the Poincaré gauge theoretic formulation of the model is not the cause of the emerging of the undesirable constraint algebra, but actually allows to overcome the problem. In fact one can fix the additional symmetry without breaking the Poincaré gauge symmetry and the diffeomorphisms, so that, after a preliminary Dirac procedure, the remaining constraints uniquely satisfy the Poincaré algebra. After the additional symmetry is fixed, the equations of motion are unaltered. The objections to our method raised by Strobl in Ref.[3] are then immaterial. Some minor points put forward in Ref.[3] are also discussed.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G. Grignani, G. Nardelli. 1993-04-21. Reply to `Comment on Gravity and the Poincare' Group'. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.48.5032
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.