Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · math-ph/0404038

The CPT Group of the Dirac Field

Miguel Socolovsky
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Using the standard representation of the Dirac equation we show that, up to signs, there exist only TWO SETS of consistent solutions for the matrices of charge conjugation (C), parity (P), and time reversal (T). In both cases, P^2=-1, and then two succesive applications of the parity transformation to spin 1/2 fields NECESSARILY amounts to a 2πrotation. Each of these sets generates a non abelian group of sixteen elements, G_1 and G_2, which are non isomorphic subgroups of the Dirac algebra, which, being a Clifford algebra, gives a geometric nature to the generators, in particular to C. It turns out that G_1 is isomorphic to D_8 x Z_2, where D_8 is the dihedral group of eight elements (the symmetries of the square) and Z_2 is isomorphic to S^0 (the 0-sphere); while G_2 is isomorphic to a certain semidirect product of D_8 and Z_2. Instead, the corresponding quantum operators for C, P, and T generate a UNIQUE group G, which we call THE CPT GROUP OF THE DIRAC FIELD, and which is isomorphic to Q x Z_2, where Q is the quaternion group. This group, however, is compatible only with the second of the above two matrix solutions, namely with G_2, which is then called THE MATRIX CPT GROUP. It is interesting to remark that G_1, G_2, and G are the only non abelian groups of sixteen elements with three generators. Finally, the matrix groups are also given in the Weyl and Majorana representations, suitable for taking the massless limit and for describing self-conjugate fields.

Explore related subjects

math-phhep-thmath.MP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Miguel Socolovsky. 2004-08-12. The CPT Group of the Dirac Field. https://doi.org/10.1023/b%3Aijtp.0000049003.90851.60

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗