arXiv · math/0007025
A note on an alleged proof of the relative consistency of P=NP with PA
Abstract
We indicate that an argument of da Costa and Doria in fact proves P=NP. This observation makes their argument appear dubious. We isolate a weak version of one of their lemmas which would already prove P=NP. We point out that even this weak version is probably false. In fact, a generalized form of this weak version is provably false.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Ralf Schindler. 2000-07-11. A note on an alleged proof of the relative consistency of P=NP with PA. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0007025
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.