arXiv · math/0408431
A counter-example to the theorem of Hiemer and Snurnikov
Abstract
A planar polygonal billiard $¶$ is said to have the finite blocking property if for every pair $(O,A)$ of points in $¶$ there exists a finite number of ``blocking'' points $B_1, ..., B_n$ such that every billiard trajectory from $O$ to $A$ meets one of the $B_i$'s. As a counter-example to a theorem of Hiemer and Snurnikov, we construct a family of rational billiards that lack the finite blocking property.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Thierry Monteil. 2004-08-31. A counter-example to the theorem of Hiemer and Snurnikov. https://doi.org/10.1023/b%3Ajoss.0000013974.81162.20
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.