SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · math/0409578

C.F. Gauss' Präzisionsmessungen terrestrischer Dreiecke und seine Überlegungen zur empirischen Fundierung der Geometrie in den 1820er Jahren (C.F. Gauss' high precion measurements of terrestrial triangles and his thoughts on the empirical foundations of geometry in the 1820s)

Abstract

In the historical literature there has been an extended discussion on the question, whether the report of Sartorius von Waltershausen about C. F. Gauss checking the largest triangle of the geodetical measurement campaign in the kingdom of Hannover as a kind of ``test'' for the Euclididean nature of physical space can be taken seriously or not. Among others, it was argued that it even was logically impossible for Gauss to do so in the early 1820s (i.e. in particular, before J. Bolyai's, N.I. Lobachevsy's, or even B. Riemann's works). This article shows, in which sense Gauss's methodology of curvature of surfaces, although logically developed in all clarity only for surfaces embedded in Euclidean 3-space, could very well be used already in the early 1820 to investigate the above mentioned question in the sense of physical geometry. Although we do not have a definitive proof of the respective calculations by Gauss's own hand, the latter's account of the situation to contemporaries (correspondents, friend and students) changed clearly between the early and the late 1820s. That speaks very much in favour of a basic correctness of Sartorius von Waltershausen's report on this topic.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Erhard Scholz. 2004-09-29. C.F. Gauss' Präzisionsmessungen terrestrischer Dreiecke und seine Überlegungen zur empirischen Fundierung der Geometrie in den 1820er Jahren (C.F. Gauss' high precion measurements of terrestrial triangles and his thoughts on the empirical foundations of geometry in the 1820s). https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0409578

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO