Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · math/0506395

Pseudospheres in geometry and physics: from Beltrami to De Sitter and beyond

Abstract

We review the extraordinary fertility and proliferation in mathematics and physics of the concept of a surface with constant and negative Gaussian curvature. In his outstanding 1868 paper Beltrami discussed how non-Euclidean geometry is actually realized and displayed in a disk on the plane. This metric is intrinsically defined and definite but only if indefinite metrics are introduced it is possible to fully understand the structure of pseudospheres. In a 3D flat space R^3 the fundamental quadric is introduced, with the same signature as the metric of R^3; this leads to 3 kinds of surfaces with constant Gaussian curvature: the sphere, the single-sheet hyperboloid and the two-sheet hyperboloid; the last one is shown to be isomorphic to Beltrami's disk. The spacetime corresponding to the single-sheet case is de Sitter cosmological model, which, due to its symmetry, has an important role in cosmology. When two of the three fundamental quadrics are combined, a simple, yet deep, solution of Einstein-Maxwell equations corresponding to a uniform electromagnetic field is obtained with many applications in mathematical physics. One of them is a "no go" theorem: when one tries to frame a Riemannian four-dimensional manifold in a Kahlerian structure, it is found that, while this is generically possible with a definite signature, in spacetime only BR fulfills the requirement. The BR metric plays an important role in the exploration of new principles in fundamental physical theories; we briefly mention some examples related to the horizon of a black hole and the dilaton in string theory.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B. Bertotti, R. Catenacci, C. Dappiaggi. 2005-06-20. Pseudospheres in geometry and physics: from Beltrami to De Sitter and beyond. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0506395

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Early career researcher responses to AI in math

We've heard a lot about AI in math from Fields medalists, AI labs, and established professors. However, the personal stakes are highest for early career researchers. Hoping to provide a platform for graduate students and postdocs to voice their opinions, concerns, and experiences, we wrote and distributed a survey on AI in math. In this article, we share the responses to our survey. All responses are anonymous, and respondents came from almost $60$ institutions and at least $5$ countries. Our survey included both multiple choice questions and more open-ended free response questions. If you are a senior mathematician or university administrator reading these survey results, our goal is for you to understand the concerns of the younger generations and use your authority to take action accordingly. If you are an early career mathematician reading these survey results, we hope you find comfort in the knowledge that your experiences are shared by many others. If you are not a mathematician, we hope you come away from this article with a deeper understanding of the goals, values, and concerns of the community.

math.HO↗

Mathematical Reality Capture: from the age of discoveries to mathematical topography and surveys

A proof answers a precise question, but mathematical understanding also grows through the relationships that its answer makes visible. A point measurement likewise differs from a photograph or a three-dimensional reconstruction of a building. In this work, we argue that, with the help of AI, mathematics should move from a discipline focused on isolated investigations of mathematical objects towards one capable of mapping them systematically. We therefore introduce the idea of "Mathematical Reality Capture", inspired by digital surveying and the reconstruction of a scene from several viewpoints. An elementary example shows how comparing algebra and geometry can illuminate the same phenomenon, provided that we distinguish diversity of explanations from validity of proof. From this analogy we derive criteria for building verifiable atlases, an experiment with which to assess their usefulness, and a reflection on the role of mathematicians in interpreting them.

math.HO↗