Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · math/0511382

Equivalences between cluster categories

Abstract

Tilting theory in cluster categories of hereditary algebras has been developed in [BMRRT] and [BMR]. These results are generalized to cluster categories of hereditary abelian categories. Furthermore, for any tilting object $T$ in a hereditary abelian category $\mathcal{H}$, we verify that the tilting functor Hom$_\mathcal{H}(T,-)$ induces a triangle equivalence from the cluster category $\mathcal{C(H)}$ to the cluster category $\mathcal{C}(A)$, where $A$ is the quasi-tilted algebra End$_{\mathcal{H}}T.$ Under the condition that one of derived categories of hereditary abelian categories $\mathcal{H},$ $\mathcal{H}'$ is triangle equivalent to the derived category of a hereditary algebra, we prove that the cluster categories $\mathcal{C(H)}$ and $\mathcal{C(H')}$ are triangle equivalent to each other if and only if $\mathcal{H}$ and $\mathcal{H}'$ are derived equivalent, by using the precise relation between cluster-tilted algebras (by definition, the endomorphism algebras of tilting objects in cluster categories) and the corresponding quasi-tilted algebras proved previously. As an application, we give a realization of "truncated simple reflections" defined by Fomin-Zelevinsky on the set of almost positive roots of the corresponding type [FZ2, FZ5], by taking $\mathcal{H}$ to be the representation category of a valued Dynkin quiver and $T$ a BGP-tilting (or APR-tilting, in other words).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bin Zhu. 2006-06-19. Equivalences between cluster categories. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0511382

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A lecture note on covering theory in representation theory of algebras

Covering theory is an important tool in representation theory of algebras, however, the results and the proofs are scattered in the literature. We give an introduction to covering theory at a level as elementary as possible and in a more general way on some basic notions than the existing literature does.

math.RT↗

On the Orthogonal Projections

Let $A$ be a finite-dimensional algebra and $e$ a rigid presentation. We give an explicit formula for the left adjoint to the inclusion $\operatorname{rep}(e^\perp)\hookrightarrow \operatorname{rep}(A)$ and construct a bijection between presentations in $\operatorname{rep}(e^\perp)$ and presentations compatible with $e$. The induced bijection on weights preserves generic $\operatorname{E}$-invariants and canonical decompositions. If $A$ is Jacobian, the reduction algebra is Jacobian for every rigid $e$. We prove mutation formulas for the signed completions and for the dimension vectors of the simple objects of $\operatorname{rep}(e^\perp)$, enabling an algorithm to find the projected quiver with potential when $e$ is extended-reachable. Additionally, we introduce a modified projection for quivers with potentials that preserves general presentations. For applications to cluster algebras, we establish a connection to the stabilization functors.

math.RT↗

Compatible gradings on dg models and cluster equivalence

Let $\La_1$ and $\La_2$ be finite-dimensional $\ta_2$-finite complex algebras of global dimension at most two. We prove that, if they are cluster equivalent, then they admit $\bbZ$-gradings for which the bounded derived categories of graded modules are triangle equivalent. The equivalence is not required to commute with the internal grading shifts. The proof uses common multigraded dg models, relative gradings on two-term silting objects, and covering quotients. We also consider tilting lifts of cluster-tilting objects with endomorphism algebras of global dimension at most two. In acyclic cluster type, the existence of such a lift for every cluster-tilting object implies piecewise heredity. We construct a counterexample without this assumption using a surface algebra associated with a one-holed torus.

math.RT↗