SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · math/0701172

On embeddings of proper and equicontinuous actions in zero-dimensional compactifications

Abstract

We provide a tool for studying properly discontinuous actions of non-compact groups on locally compact, connected and paracompact spaces, by embedding such an action in a suitable zero-dimensional compactification of the underlying space with pleasant properties. Precisely, given such an action $(G,X)$ we construct a zero-dimensional compactification $μX$ of $X$ with the properties: (a) there exists an extension of the action on $μX$, (b) if $μL\subseteq μX\setminus X$ is the set of the limit points of the orbits of the initial action in $μX$, then the restricted action $(G,μX\setminus μL)$ remains properly discontinuous, is indivisible and equicontinuous with respect to the uniformity induced on $μX\setminus μL$ by that of $μX$, and (c) $μX$ is the maximal among the zero-dimensional compactifications of $X$ with these properties. Proper actions are usually embedded in the end point compactification $εX$ of $X$, in order to obtain topological invariants concerning the cardinality of the space of the ends of $X$, provided that $X$ has an additional "nice" property of rather local character ("property Z", i.e., every compact subset of $X$ is contained in a compact and connected one). If the considered space has this property, our new compactification coincides with the end point one. On the other hand, we give an example of a space not having the "property Z" for which our compactification is different from the end point compactification. As an application, we show that the invariant concerning the cardinality of the ends of $X$ holds also for a class of actions strictly containing the properly discontinuous ones and for spaces not necessarily having "property Z".

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Antonios Manoussos, Polychronis Strantzalos. 2007-01-05. On embeddings of proper and equicontinuous actions in zero-dimensional compactifications. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0701172

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN