Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · physics/0110093

Bayesian inference for inverse problems

Ali Mohammad-Djafari
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Traditionally, the MaxEnt workshops start by a tutorial day. This paper summarizes my talk during 2001'th workshop at John Hopkins University. The main idea in this talk is to show how the Bayesian inference can naturally give us all the necessary tools we need to solve real inverse problems: starting by simple inversion where we assume to know exactly the forward model and all the input model parameters up to more realistic advanced problems of myopic or blind inversion where we may be uncertain about the forward model and we may have noisy data. Starting by an introduction to inverse problems through a few examples and explaining their ill posedness nature, I briefly presented the main classical deterministic methods such as data matching and classical regularization methods to show their limitations. I then presented the main classical probabilistic methods based on likelihood, information theory and maximum entropy and the Bayesian inference framework for such problems. I show that the Bayesian framework, not only generalizes all these methods, but also gives us natural tools, for example, for inferring the uncertainty of the computed solutions, for the estimation of the hyperparameters or for handling myopic or blind inversion problems. Finally, through a deconvolution problem example, I presented a few state of the art methods based on Bayesian inference particularly designed for some of the mass spectrometry data processing problems.

Explore related subjects

physics.data-an

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ali Mohammad-Djafari. 2001-10-31. Bayesian inference for inverse problems. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1477067

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Combinations of measurements that are simultaneous fits of parameters of interest and systematic uncertainties using the BLUE method

Combining estimates of the same physics parameter obtained from different measurements improves the precision and robustness of the parameter determination. Modern particle physics measurements are often performed using likelihood fits that include the physics parameter(s) of interest together with nuisance parameters representing systematic uncertainties. In high-statistics analyses, typical of many analyses at the Large Hadron Collider, these nuisance parameters can be constrained in the likelihood fits. We describe how the Best Linear Unbiased Estimator method for combinations can be applied to both the estimates of the parameters of interest and the estimates of the nuisance parameters. We show with concrete example combinations that including the nuisance parameters can improve the precision on the parameters of interest. We show with pseudo-experiments that the uncertainty reported by the combination is reliable and that the approximate likelihood combination proposed in a previous publication and implemented in the Convino software reports an underestimated uncertainty. The method is implemented in an open-source software tool, Combiner.

physics.data-an↗
arXiv2026

Quantity, quality, and timing: Guiding glacier data assimilation strategies in the high Arctic

Accurate simulation of glacier surface mass balance is essential for predicting sea level rise and freshwater resources, but it is constrained by uncertainties in meteorological forcing and model parameters. Here, we deploy glacier data assimilation strategies to assess the value of observations for improving surface mass balance simulation, focusing on observation quantity, quality, and timing. We perform synthetic twin experiments on Kongsvegen glacier, Svalbard, using a Particle Batch Smoother with 1000 ensemble members. Synthetic observations of albedo, snow depth, and surface temperature are assimilated at two quality levels, under two climatic scenarios, and over 12 years. Assimilation benefit is measured as the percentage improvement in the continuous ranked probability score of the posterior glacier surface mass balance relative to the prior. A single optimally timed high quality observation yields mean improvements of up to 80\%. Larger numbers of low quality observations partially compensate for lower improvement. In the accumulation zone, however, additional snow depth observations degrade performance through particle degeneracy. Optimal timing is governed by the seasonal transitions of the truth trajectory rather than by prior ensemble spread alone. The optimal windows shift by up to six weeks between early and late melting years. Joint assimilation adds value through temporal diversity rather than observational diversity, while independently timed observations outperform same day combinations. The asynchronously optimally timed combined assimilation of three variables sustains improvements of 85 to 97\% across all years in the ablation zone. These findings provide guidelines for adaptive observation scheduling in glacier monitoring and reanalysis.

physics.data-an↗
arXiv2026

The Greedy Bump Bias: Local Profiling Geometry and the Look-Elsewhere Effect

When fitting a localized signal whose position or shape is not known in advance, one typically allows these parameters to vary together with the signal amplitude and chooses the values that maximize the likelihood. This freedom has two related statistical consequences. If a genuine signal is present, its fitted amplitude will be affected by a positive bias; otherwise, the same freedom increases the chance of finding an unusually signal-like background fluctuation, giving rise to the look-elsewhere effect. We show that these two effects can be understood as consequences of the same local geometry of the family of signal templates. We study this connection in a Gaussian matched-filter model, where a smooth D-dimensional family of normalized templates describes the unknown signal location or shape. In the normalized matched-filter problem, the curvature of a genuine signal peak and the fluctuations that determine the curvature of a high background peak are governed by the same template metric. This allows us to derive an explicit asymptotic relation. We then follow the problem away from the strong-signal and high-threshold limits. Separating the signal-associated maximum from the best competing maximum gives an exact decomposition of the global bias into a local profiling contribution and a contribution from remote-peak competition. In a one-dimensional Gaussian example, the second factorial cumulant accounts for most of this correction, while the third brings the prediction into close agreement with simulation. A two-point Kac--Rice calculation reproduces the second cumulant and reveals a quartic short-distance suppression of nearby maxima. The resulting picture separates the roles of local dimension, model-dependent curvature, and global extremal competition within a common framework.

physics.data-an↗