Einstein et la mecanique quantique - Quelques reperes, quelques surprises

P. Roussel

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · physics/0602044

Einstein et la mecanique quantique - Quelques reperes, quelques surprises

P. Roussel

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Even if Einstein brought major contributions as a founder of quantum mechanics, he remained deeply unsatisfied with the bases of this structure he knew to be so efficient for physics. His critics are often known through his numerous controversies wih N. Bohr for a few decades. It has long been suggested that his critics were obsolete and came from an aging man and that it was more a question of philosophy anyway. After J. Bell's contribution however it was claimed that the debate could be closed by an experimental proof, a strange experimental intrusion in philosophy or a strange philosophy. Finally, the experiment being performed, in particular in Orsay with the repeatedly successful experiments of A. Aspect, it was claimed that N. Bohr won. Would the debate be closed? Today and fifty years after his death, it seems that Einstein's critics to quantum mechanics are being regarded differently. Why is it so? Is it due to physics coming back to the debate? It will be attempted to accurately report Einstein's writings on the matter and to find elements of answer to the raised questions.

Explore related subjects

physics.hist-ph quant-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

P. Roussel. 2006-02-07. Einstein et la mecanique quantique - Quelques reperes, quelques surprises. https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0602044

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Holistic Versus Fragmented Multiverses: Empirical Access via Causal and Grounding Signatures

Several objections have been raised against the scientificity of multiverse scenarios. This chapter defends the scientificity of certain multiverse scenarios by distinguishing fragmented from holistic multiverses. Concepts of multiverse used in physics are almost always holistic: they embed universes within a broader, unifying physical or metaphysical multiversal structure that can, in principle, leave empirical signatures inside the universes. I develop a classification of such signatures and show how it applies to a number of scenarios from quantum theory, cosmology, and string theory. The framework clarifies why objections such as the `this universe' objection and a newly articulated generalization, the epistemic isolation objection, fail against scientifically motivated multiverses.

physics.hist-ph↗

arXiv2026

The search for the Higgs Boson and the EBH mechanism

The searches for the Higgs boson at LEP and the Tevatron between 1980 and 2000 are set in the context of the underlying theory of spontaneous symmetry breaking and early phenomenological studies. The evolution of direct searches at LEP and the Tevatron are reviewed, as well as indirect constraints from precision electroweak data. Finally, the state of play in 2000 is summarised, together with the perspectives it offered for later searches.

physics.hist-ph↗

arXiv2026

Der Stern von Bethlehem -- Einige Theorien und Hintergruende: Von der altorientalischen Astrologie ueber Kepler zu Newton

Many have have taken in hand to write a treatise on the Star of Bethlehem, particularly on Kepler's explanation as a stellar birth, triggered by Mars joining a great conjunction (a meeting of Jupiter and Saturn), as he observed it in October 1604. It is the aim of my short treatise to introduce, at a hopefully well digestible level, into underlying antiquity's concepts of physics, astrology, and astronomy around the time of Christ's birth and to demonstrate their essential developments up to the early modern period. In the latter, Kepler played a significant role. His contributions enabled him to calculate back to the year 7 BC with astonishing precision, locating a triple great conjunction in Pisces, which was then complemented by Mars. This is confirmed by both Babylonian tradition and modern astronomy. The following background provided may be specifically helpful for a more theologically oriented audience, also because the controversy surrounding "geocentric" and "heliocentric" world systems (Copernicus) is touched upon. And, because the overall context raises questions for theology, with which the epilogue concludes.

physics.hist-ph↗