arXiv · quant-ph/0006014
A Refutation of Bell's Theorem
Abstract
Bell's Theorem was developed on the basis of considerations involving a linear combination of spin correlation functions, each of which has a distinct pair of arguments. The simultaneous presence of these different pairs of arguments in the same equation can be understood in two radically different ways: either as `strongly objective,' that is, all correlation functions pertain to the same set of particle pairs, or as `weakly objective,' that is, each correlation function pertains to a different set of particle pairs. It is demonstrated that once this meaning is determined, no discrepancy appears between local realistic theories and quantum mechanics: the discrepancy in Bell's Theorem is due only to a meaningless comparison between a local realistic inequality written within the strongly objective interpretation (thus relevant to a single set of particle pairs) and a quantum mechanical prediction derived from a weakly objective interpretation (thus relevant to several different sets of particle pairs).
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Guillaume Adenier. 2001-01-18. A Refutation of Bell's Theorem. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812810809_0002
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.