arXiv · quant-ph/0509092
Reply to: 'Reply to: "Comment on: `How much security does Y-00 protocol provide us?` " '
Abstract
Nishioka et al claim in [1], elaborating on their earlier paper [2], that the direct encryption scheme called Y-00 [3,4] is equivalent to a classical non-random additive stream cipher, and thus offers no more security than the latter. In this paper, we show that this claim is false and that Y-00 may be considered equivalent to a \emph{random} cipher. We explain why a random cipher provides additional security compared to its nonrandom counterpart. Some criticisms in [1] on the use of Y-00 for key generation are also briefly responded to.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Ranjith Nair, Horace P. Yuen, Eric Corndorf, Prem Kumar. 2005-09-13. Reply to: 'Reply to: "Comment on: `How much security does Y-00 protocol provide us?` " '. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0509092
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.