The contrast between real and $p$-adic integrability
One of the most intriguing questions in $p$-adic symplectic geometry is to what extent it captures phenomena outside of real symplectic geometry. Since symplectic geometry has its origins in classical mechanics, and since integrable systems are essentially physical systems with many conserved quantities, it is natural to ask if considering the same system with coefficients in $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{Q}_p$ respectively, will lead us to see the same or different behaviors. Our first goal in this paper is prove that the $p$-adic and real local normal forms of the same system have no relation, that is, any combination of real and $p$-adic local normal forms is possible. This implies that $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{Q}_p$ capture fundamentally different information about the system, despite the fact that they both contain $\mathbb{Q}$ as a dense subset and that experiments can only measure rational quantities. Hence a $p$-adic version of symplectic geometry and Hamiltonian mechanics will be different from its real counterpart, at least from the point of view of integrable systems. Our second goal in this paper is to introduce techniques to compute these normal forms. We establish these results combining Galois theory of $p$-adic fields with analytic estimates.