arXiv subjects

A. C. Deshpande

Publications and source records attributed to A. C. Deshpande.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Euclid preparation. Cosmology Likelihood for Observables in Euclid (CLOE). 2. Code implementation

We provide a description of the code implementation and structure of Cosmology Likelihood for Observables in Euclid (CLOE), developed by members of the Euclid Consortium. CLOE is a modular Python code for computing the theoretical predictions of cosmological observables and evaluating them against state-of-the-art data from galaxy surveys such as Euclid in a unified likelihood. This primarily includes the core observables of weak gravitational lensing, photometric galaxy clustering, galaxy-galaxy lensing, and spectroscopic galaxy clustering, but also extended probes such as the clusters of galaxies and cross-correlations of galaxy positions and shapes with the cosmic microwave background. While CLOE has been developed to serve as the unified framework for the parameter inferences in Euclid, it has general capabilities that can serve the broader cosmological community. It is different from other comparable cosmological tools in that it is written entirely in Python, performs the full likelihood calculation, and includes both photometric and spectroscopic observables. We will focus on the primary probes of Euclid and will describe the overall code structure, rigorous code development practices, extensive documentation, unique features, speed optimization, and future development plans. CLOE is publicly available at https://github.com/cloe-org/cloe.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2023

Euclid preparation: XXVIII. Modelling of the weak lensing angular power spectrum

This work considers which higher-order effects in modelling the cosmic shear angular power spectra must be taken into account for Euclid. We identify which terms are of concern, and quantify their individual and cumulative impact on cosmological parameter inference from Euclid. We compute the values of these higher-order effects using analytic expressions, and calculate the impact on cosmological parameter estimation using the Fisher matrix formalism. We review 24 effects and find the following potentially need to be accounted for: the reduced shear approximation, magnification bias, source-lens clustering, source obscuration, local Universe effects, and the flat Universe assumption. Upon computing these explicitly, and calculating their cosmological parameter biases, using a maximum multipole of $\ell=5000$, we find that the magnification bias, source-lens clustering, source obscuration, and local Universe terms individually produce significant ($\,>0.25σ$) cosmological biases in one or more parameters, and accordingly must be accounted for. In total, over all effects, we find biases in $Ω_{\rm m}$, $Ω_{\rm b}$, $h$, and $σ_{8}$ of $0.73σ$, $0.28σ$, $0.25σ$, and $-0.79σ$, respectively, for flat $Λ$CDM. For the $w_0w_a$CDM case, we find biases in $Ω_{\rm m}$, $Ω_{\rm b}$, $h$, $n_{\rm s}$, $σ_{8}$, and $w_a$ of $1.49σ$, $0.35σ$, $-1.36σ$, $1.31σ$, $-0.84σ$, and $-0.35σ$, respectively; which are increased relative to the $Λ$CDM due to additional degeneracies as a function of redshift and scale.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2022

The Impact of Quadratic Biases on Cosmic Shear

In this paper we revisit potential biases in cosmic shear power spectra caused by bias terms that multiply up to quadratic powers of the shear. Expanding the multiplicative bias field as a series of independent spin-$s$ fields we find terms $m_s$ that multiply integer and half-integer powers of the shear. We propagate these biases into shape measurement statistics and the cosmic shear power spectrum. We find that such biases can be measured by performing regression on calibration data. We find that for integer powers of shear the impact of quadratic order terms on the power spectrum is an additional bispectrum dependency; ignoring quadratic terms can lead to biases in cosmological parameters of up to $2(m_2+m_{-2}-m_6)0.4σ$ for Stage-IV dark energy experiments, but that the susceptibility to them can be decreased by using methods to remove small-scale sensitivity. We also find, for half-integer powers of the shear that, for a Stage-IV experiment, biases are required to be known to better than approximately $σ[m_0+15(m_1+m_3)+0.1(m_{-1}+m_5)]\leq 0.01$. In future, Stage-IV dark energy experiments should seek to measure and minimise such all such bias terms.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2021

Mapping Spatially Varying Additive Biases in Cosmic Shear Data

In this paper we address the challenge of extracting maps of spatially varying unknown additive biases from cosmic shear data. This is done by exploiting the isotropy of the cosmic shear field, and the anisotropy of a typical additive bias field, using an autocorrelation discrepancy map; which identifies significant non-Gaussian components of the map. We test this approach using simulations and find that the autocorrelation discrepancy map produces spatially varying features that are indicative of the additive bias field both in amplitude and spatial variation. We then apply this to the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data, and find evidence for spatially varying additive biases of at most 0.002 on large-scales. The method can be used to empirically inform modelling of the spatially varying additive bias field in any cosmological parameter inference, and can act as a validation test for cosmic shear surveys.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2021

Euclid: Forecasts for $k$-cut $3 \times 2$ Point Statistics

Modelling uncertainties at small scales, i.e. high $k$ in the power spectrum $P(k)$, due to baryonic feedback, nonlinear structure growth and the fact that galaxies are biased tracers poses a significant obstacle to fully leverage the constraining power of the {\it Euclid} wide-field survey. $k$-cut cosmic shear has recently been proposed as a method to optimally remove sensitivity to these scales while preserving usable information. In this paper we generalise the $k$-cut cosmic shear formalism to $3 \times 2$ point statistics and estimate the loss of information for different $k$-cuts in a $3 \times 2$ point analysis of the {\it Euclid} data. Extending the Fisher matrix analysis of~\citet{blanchard2019euclid}, we assess the degradation in constraining power for different $k$-cuts. We work in the idealised case and assume the galaxy bias is linear, the covariance is Gaussian, while neglecting uncertainties due to photo-z errors and baryonic feedback. We find that taking a $k$-cut at $2.6 \ h \ {\rm Mpc} ^{-1}$ yields a dark energy Figure of Merit (FOM) of 1018. This is comparable to taking a weak lensing cut at $\ell = 5000$ and a galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing cut at $\ell = 3000$ in a traditional $3 \times 2$ point analysis. We also find that the fraction of the observed galaxies used in the photometric clustering part of the analysis is one of the main drivers of the FOM. Removing $50 \% \ (90 \%)$ of the clustering galaxies decreases the FOM by $19 \% \ (62 \%)$. Given that the FOM depends so heavily on the fraction of galaxies used in the clustering analysis, extensive efforts should be made to handle the real-world systematics present when extending the analysis beyond the luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2020

Propagating residual biases in masked cosmic shear power spectra

In this paper we derive a full expression for the propagation of weak lensing shape measurement biases into cosmic shear power spectra including the effect of missing data. We show using simulations that terms higher than first order in bias parameters can be ignored and the impact of biases can be captured by terms dependent only on the mean of the multiplicative bias field. We identify that the B-mode power contains information on the multiplicative bias. We find that without priors on the residual multiplicative bias $δm$ and stochastic ellipticity variance $σ_e$ that constraints on the amplitude of the cosmic shear power spectrum are completely degenerate, and that when applying priors the constrained amplitude $A$ is slightly biased low via a classic marginalisation paradox. Using all-sky Gaussian random field simulations we find that the combination of $(1+2δm)A$ is unbiased for a joint EE and BB power spectrum likelihood if the error and mean (precision and accuracy) of the stochastic ellipticity variance is known to better than $σ(σ_e)\leq 0.05$ and $Δσ_e\leq 0.01$, or the multiplicative bias is known to better than $σ(m)\leq 0.07$ and $Δm\leq 0.01$.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2020

Euclid: The reduced shear approximation and magnification bias for Stage IV cosmic shear experiments

Stage IV weak lensing experiments will offer more than an order of magnitude leap in precision. We must therefore ensure that our analyses remain accurate in this new era. Accordingly, previously ignored systematic effects must be addressed. In this work, we evaluate the impact of the reduced shear approximation and magnification bias, on the information obtained from the angular power spectrum. To first-order, the statistics of reduced shear, a combination of shear and convergence, are taken to be equal to those of shear. However, this approximation can induce a bias in the cosmological parameters that can no longer be neglected. A separate bias arises from the statistics of shear being altered by the preferential selection of galaxies and the dilution of their surface densities, in high-magnification regions. The corrections for these systematic effects take similar forms, allowing them to be treated together. We calculated the impact of neglecting these effects on the cosmological parameters that would be determined from Euclid, using cosmic shear tomography. To do so, we employed the Fisher matrix formalism, and included the impact of the super-sample covariance. We also demonstrate how the reduced shear correction can be calculated using a lognormal field forward modelling approach. These effects cause significant biases in Omega_m, sigma_8, n_s, Omega_DE, w_0, and w_a of -0.53 sigma, 0.43 sigma, -0.34 sigma, 1.36 sigma, -0.68 sigma, and 1.21 sigma, respectively. We then show that these lensing biases interact with another systematic: the intrinsic alignment of galaxies. Accordingly, we develop the formalism for an intrinsic alignment-enhanced lensing bias correction. Applying this to Euclid, we find that the additional terms introduced by this correction are sub-dominant.

astro-ph.CO↗