arXiv subjects

A. Güemes

Publications and source records attributed to A. Güemes.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

Fully convolutional networks for velocity-field predictions based on the wall heat flux in turbulent boundary layers

Fully-convolutional neural networks (FCN) were proven to be effective for predicting the instantaneous state of a fully-developed turbulent flow at different wall-normal locations using quantities measured at the wall. In Guastoni et al. [J. Fluid Mech. 928, A27 (2021)], we focused on wall-shear-stress distributions as input, which are difficult to measure in experiments. In order to overcome this limitation, we introduce a model that can take as input the heat-flux field at the wall from a passive scalar. Four different Prandtl numbers $Pr = ν/α= (1,2,4,6)$ are considered (where $ν$ is the kinematic viscosity and $α$ is the thermal diffusivity of the scalar quantity). A turbulent boundary layer is simulated since accurate heat-flux measurements can be performed in experimental settings: first we train the network on aptly-modified DNS data and then we fine-tune it on the experimental data. Finally, we test our network on experimental data sampled in a water tunnel. These predictions represent the first application of transfer learning on experimental data of neural networks trained on simulations. This paves the way for the implementation of a non-intrusive sensing approach for the flow in practical applications.

physics.flu-dyn↗

arXiv2021

Predicting the near-wall region of turbulence through convolutional neural networks

Modelling the near-wall region of wall-bounded turbulent flows is a widespread practice to reduce the computational cost of large-eddy simulations (LESs) at high Reynolds number. As a first step towards a data-driven wall-model, a neural-network-based approach to predict the near-wall behaviour in a turbulent open channel flow is investigated. The fully-convolutional network (FCN) proposed by Guastoni et al. [preprint, arXiv:2006.12483] is trained to predict the two-dimensional velocity-fluctuation fields at $y^{+}_{\rm target}$, using the sampled fluctuations in wall-parallel planes located farther from the wall, at $y^{+}_{\rm input}$. The data for training and testing is obtained from a direct numerical simulation (DNS) at friction Reynolds numbers $Re_τ = 180$ and $550$. The turbulent velocity-fluctuation fields are sampled at various wall-normal locations, i.e. $y^{+} = \{15, 30, 50, 80, 100, 120, 150\}$. At $Re_τ=550$, the FCN can take advantage of the self-similarity in the logarithmic region of the flow and predict the velocity-fluctuation fields at $y^{+} = 50$ using the velocity-fluctuation fields at $y^{+} = 100$ as input with less than 20% error in prediction of streamwise-fluctuations intensity. These results are an encouraging starting point to develop a neural-network based approach for modelling turbulence at the wall in numerical simulations.

physics.flu-dyn↗

arXiv2020

Convolutional-network models to predict wall-bounded turbulence from wall quantities

Two models based on convolutional neural networks are trained to predict the two-dimensional velocity-fluctuation fields at different wall-normal locations in a turbulent open channel flow, using the wall-shear-stress components and the wall pressure as inputs. The first model is a fully-convolutional neural network (FCN) which directly predicts the fluctuations, while the second one reconstructs the flow fields using a linear combination of orthonormal basis functions, obtained through proper orthogonal decomposition (POD), hence named FCN-POD. Both models are trained using data from two direct numerical simulations (DNS) at friction Reynolds numbers $Re_τ = 180$ and $550$. Thanks to their ability to predict the nonlinear interactions in the flow, both models show a better prediction performance than the extended proper orthogonal decomposition (EPOD), which establishes a linear relation between input and output fields. The performance of the various models is compared based on predictions of the instantaneous fluctuation fields, turbulence statistics and power-spectral densities. The FCN exhibits the best predictions closer to the wall, whereas the FCN-POD model provides better predictions at larger wall-normal distances. We also assessed the feasibility of performing transfer learning for the FCN model, using the weights from $Re_τ=180$ to initialize those of the $Re_τ=550$ case. Our results indicate that it is possible to obtain a performance similar to that of the reference model up to $y^{+}=50$, with $50\%$ and $25\%$ of the original training data. These non-intrusive sensing models will play an important role in applications related to closed-loop control of wall-bounded turbulence.

physics.flu-dyn↗