arXiv subjects

A. Jaffe

Publications and source records attributed to A. Jaffe.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2000

The Quintessential CMB, Past & Future

The past, present and future of cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy research is discussed, with emphasis on the Boomerang and Maxima balloon experiments. These data are combined with large scale structure (LSS) information and high redshift supernova (SN1) observations to explore the inflation-based cosmic structure formation paradigm. Here we primarily focus on a simplified inflation parameter set, {omega_b,omega_{cdm},Omega_{tot}, Omega_Q,w_Q, n_s,tau_C, sigma_8}. After marginalizing over the other cosmic and experimental variables, we find the current CMB+LSS+SN1 data gives Omega_{tot}=1.04\pm 0.05, consistent with (non-baroque) inflation theory. Restricting to Omega_{tot}=1, we find a nearly scale invariant spectrum, n_s =1.03 \pm 0.07. The CDM density, omega_{cdm}=0.17\pm 0.02, is in the expected range, but the baryon density, omega_b=0.030\pm 0.004, is slightly larger than the current nucleosynthesis estimate. Substantial dark energy is inferred, Omega_Q\approx 0.68\pm 0.05, and CMB+LSS Omega_Q values are compatible with the independent SN1 estimates. The dark energy equation of state, parameterized by a quintessence-field pressure-to-density ratio w_Q, is not well determined by CMB+LSS (w_Q<-0.3 at 95%CL), but when combined with SN1 the resulting w_Q<-0.7 limit is quite consistent with the w_Q=-1 cosmological constant case. Though forecasts of statistical errors on parameters for current and future experiments are rosy, rooting out systematic errors will define the true progress.

astro-ph↗

arXiv1996

Gamma Rays and the Decay of Neutrinos from SN1987A

We calculate limits to the properties of massive, unstable neutrinos using data from gamma-ray detectors on the Pioneer Venus Orbiter Satellite; a massive neutrino emitted from SN1987A that decayed in flight and produced gamma rays would be detectable by this instruments. The lack of such a signal allows us to constrain the branching ratio to photons ($\Bg$), mass ($\mnu$), and radiative lifetime ($τ_γ= τ/\Bg$). For low mass ($m<T\sim8\MeV$) neutrinos decaying $ν\rightarrowν'γ$, $\Bg<3\times 10^{-7}$, for $\mt\lesssim 10^6 \keV\sec$, and $\Bg<6\times 10^{-14} \mt/\keV\sec$ for $\mt\gtrsim 10^6 \keV\sec$; limits for high-mass neutrinos are somewhat weaker due to Boltzmann suppression. We also calculate limits for decays that produce gamma rays through the \brem channel, $ν\rightarrowν'e^+e^-γ$. In the case that neutrino mass states are nearly degenerate, $δm^2/m^2\ll1$, our limits for the mode $ν\rightarrowν'γ$ become more stringent by a factor of $δm^2/m^2$, because more of the decay photons are shifted into the PVO detector energy window.

astro-ph↗

arXiv1995

Likelihood Analysis of Large-Scale Flows

We apply a likelihood analysis to the data of \markcite{Lauer \& Postman 1994} With $P(k)$ parametrized by $(σ_8, Γ)$, the likelihood function peaks at $σ_8\simeq0.3$, $Γ\lesssim0.025$, indicating at face value very strong large-scale power, though at a level incompatible with COBE\@. There is, however, a ridge of likelihood such that more conventional power spectra do not seem strongly disfavored. The likelihood calculated using as data only the components of the bulk flow solution peaks at higher $σ_8$, in agreement with other analyses, but is rather broad. The likelihood incorporating both bulk flow and shear gives a different picture. The components of the shear are all low, and this pulls the peak to lower amplitudes as a compromise. The Lauer \& Postman velocity data alone are therefore {\em consistent}\/ with models with very strong large scale power which generates a large bulk flow, but the small shear (which also probes fairly large scales) requires that the power would have to be at {\em very}\/ large scales, which is strongly disfavored by COBE\@. The velocity data also seem compatible with more conventional $P(k)$ with $0.2\lesssimΓ\lesssim0.5$, and the likelihood is peaked around $σ_8\sim1$, in which case the bulk flow is a moderate, but not extreme, statistical fluctuation. Applying the same techniques to the data of \markcite{Riess, Press, \& Kirshner 1995}, the results are quite different. The flow is not inconsistent with the microwave dipole and we derive only an upper limit to the amplitude of the power spectrum: $σ_8\lesssim1.5$ at roughly 99\%.

astro-ph↗