Average soft X-ray surface brightness profile of massive galaxy clusters in Magneticum simulations
The self-similar growth of massive galaxy clusters suggests that radial profiles of their key thermodynamic properties should have identical shapes after proper mass- and redshift-dependent re-scaling. This property, tested within the virial radius on samples of well-studied individual objects, together with clear and robust observational characteristics such as sensitivity and background accounting, enables the possibility of stacking observations that can be confronted with identically-derived population-averaged predictions from theory or numerical simulations at large radii. Such a comparison not only eliminates effects of inevitable stochasticity in properties of individual objects, but also allows one to reach higher sensitivity for the faintest regions on the outskirts of the clusters. In this study, we conduct a one-to-one comparison of the observed and simulated average soft X-ray surface brightness profiles of several dozen massive galaxy clusters at low redshift. We find a very good out-of-the-box agreement between the 0.3 - 2.3 keV surface brightness profile of stacked galaxy clusters recently measured by SRG/eROSITA and the corresponding predictions from the Magneticum cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, which are known to reproduce other scaling relations observed for massive galaxy clusters. A significant difference between the observed and simulated profiles is present in the very central region, where effective implementation of the AGN feedback likely results in excessive gas redistribution within the core. The simulations predict a very noisy surface brightness profile beyond several times the virial radius of the cluster, with the mean signal being orders of magnitude lower than the local radially-flat but strongly fluctuating emission background, meaning that a proper detection of this component would be very challenging even with larger samples in the future.