arXiv subjects

Aasish Kumar Sharma

Publications and source records attributed to Aasish Kumar Sharma.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Global AI Regulations for FAIR and Ethics in High-Risk Use Cases: A Comparative Review

AI governance is shifting from voluntary ethics to enforceable, risk-based regulation, yet cross-jurisdictional divergence creates compliance uncertainty for operators of high-stakes AI. We present a comparative matrix for the EU, US, and China that maps (i) risk classification triggers, (ii) binding obligations, (iii) enforcement and accountability mechanisms, and (iv) the degree to which FAIR principles are operationalised in practice. We stress-test the matrix on three high-impact domains: Electroencephalography (EEG)-guided rehabilitation robotics, AI-enabled debt collection in prospective Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) ecosystems, and AI-driven allocation of scarce Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) resources in emerging AI Factory infrastructures. Using primary legal texts and implementation evidence, we identify three recurring gaps: weak interoperability mandates, difficult operationalisation of cross-regime obligations (AI + sector regulation + data protection), and under-specified governance for critical digital infrastructure use cases. To bridge the implementation gap, we outline Knowledge Blocks, a machine-checkable compliance artefact pattern based on Resource Description Framework/Web Ontology Language (RDF/OWL), Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL), and Provenance Ontology (PROV-O), enabling audit-ready compliance-by-design across multiple regimes.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

An Empirical Evaluation of Quantum-Inspired QUBO Methods for Heterogeneous HPC Workflow Mapping and Scheduling

Heterogeneous HPC workflow scheduling under multiple hard constraints poses a challenging combinatorial optimization problem. Classical exact solvers guarantee optimality but face scalability limits, motivating interest in quantum-inspired Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) as an alternative optimization paradigm. This work presents a systematic empirical evaluation of QUBO-based scheduling methods against classical baselines including MILP, CP-SAT, GA, and HEFT. We evaluate three QUBO variants, single-run simulated annealing, multi-attempt annealing, and a layered QAOA-inspired schedule, with hybrid enhancement strategies on validation workflows (3-4 tasks) and synthetic scaling instances (5-20 tasks). All solvers are assessed through a unified pipeline tracking feasibility, makespan, and resource utilization under progressive constraint activation and controlled penalty sweeps. All approaches recover the expected optimal makespan on validation instances, confirming formulation correctness. However, feasibility degradation emerges for specific QUBO variants as constraint interactions intensify, particularly when communication costs are introduced. Penalty analysis reveals a sharp feasibility threshold for QUBO-SA, where insufficient penalties consistently fail and moderate-to-strong penalties restore feasibility. Scaling experiments show that classical solvers remain robust across all tested sizes, while QUBO-SA loses feasibility beyond 15 tasks and the QAOA-inspired variant beyond 10 tasks. The study provides a clear empirical characterization of the reliability boundaries of quantum-inspired QUBO formulations for HPC scheduling and identifies regimes where classical approaches remain preferable under current solver capabilities.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

DECICE: AI-Driven Scheduling and Digital Twin Integration for the Cloud-HPC-Edge Compute Continuum

This paper presents the DECICE project (Device Edge Cloud Intelligent Collaboration framEwork), a Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Action (Grant No. 101092582, December 2022 to November 2025) that developed an open-source framework for intelligent workload scheduling across the cloud-HPC-edge compute continuum. A consortium of 12 partners across 6 European countries organized the work into six work packages covering AI-driven scheduling, digital twin infrastructure, system architecture and integration, monitoring, use case validation, and dissemination. The two core technical contributions are an Integrated AI Scheduler (IAIS) employing RNN-based prediction and formal workflow modeling for constraint-aware workload mapping, and a Digital Twin aggregating real-time metrics with carbon intensity and anomaly prediction for energy-aware scheduling. The framework operates within Kubernetes environments, supports unified workflow ingestion from multiple formats, and bridges cloud-native and HPC orchestration through a Slurm integration layer. We present the project vision, the overall architecture, contributions from each work package, quantitative evaluation results, and the open-source release.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Ontological Knowledge Blocks: Executable Compliance and Profile-Based Validation for Trustworthy AI Systems

AI-enabled services deployed in critical digital infrastructure are subject to governance obligations spanning transparency, accountability, fairness, and traceability. Compliance today remains documentation-centric: obligations are described in prose, audits rely on static checklists, and verification depends on manual review. Such approaches do not scale to automated AI systems. This paper introduces Ontological Knowledge Blocks (OKBs), a programmable governance infrastructure that compiles regulatory obligations into machine-checkable constraints over structured evidence graphs. We formalize an OKB as a 5-tuple that binds normative obligations to an RDF/OWL concept schema, executable SHACL validation rules, explicit evidence requirements, and PROV-O provenance links. A deterministic regulatory compiler translates structured Intermediate Representation (IR) records into composable KB modules, enabling profile-based governance reconfiguration without modifying service code. We implement two prototypes and evaluate them in an AI-assisted HPC resource allocation scenario across 24 validation runs and four governance profiles. Results demonstrate profile-sensitive validation, strictly additive violation accumulation, SHACL validation latency between 12.6 ms and 100.3 ms, and profile equivalence testing confirming Combined as the strictly most comprehensive profile. All artefacts are released as open source.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

A Treasure Trove of Performance: Analyzing the IO500 Submission Data

The IO500 benchmark has become the community standard for evaluating HPC storage system performance, yet the detailed data contained in its submission packages remains largely unexplored beyond aggregate leaderboard rankings. We present a statistical characterization of 61 IO500 submissions from four competition lists (ISC21 through SC22), examining score distributions, inter-phase correlations, and insights derived from detailed log files that accompany each submission. Our analysis reveals that IO500 scores span four orders of magnitude. Spearman correlation analysis shows strong within-domain clustering for both bandwidth (rs = 0.78 to 0.96) and metadata (rs = 0.89 to 0.98) phases, with the composite sub-scores exhibiting rs = 0.92 at per-node level (Pearson r = 0.53). Log-level analysis uncovers file-system-specific patterns in IOR close-time overhead, straggler behavior during the stonewall wear-down phase, and parallel-find load imbalance that are invisible in aggregate scores. These findings demonstrate that IO500 submission packages constitute a valuable research resource for understanding storage system behavior. The full submission dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/IO500/submission-data, and analysis scripts at https://gitlab-ce.gwdg.de/hpc-team/io500-analysis.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Evaluating Large Language Models for Workload Mapping and Scheduling in Heterogeneous HPC Systems

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored for their reasoning capabilities, yet their ability to perform structured, constraint-based optimization from natural language remains insufficiently understood. This study evaluates twenty-one publicly available LLMs on a representative heterogeneous high-performance computing (HPC) workload mapping and scheduling problem. Each model received the same textual description of system nodes, task requirements, and scheduling constraints, and was required to assign tasks to nodes, compute the total makespan, and explain its reasoning. A manually derived analytical optimum of nine hours and twenty seconds served as the ground truth reference. Three models exactly reproduced the analytical optimum while satisfying all constraints, twelve achieved near-optimal results within two minutes of the reference, and six produced suboptimal schedules with arithmetic or dependency errors. All models generated feasible task-to-node mappings, though only about half maintained strict constraint adherence. Nineteen models produced partially executable verification code, and eighteen provided coherent step-by-step reasoning, demonstrating strong interpretability even when logical errors occurred. Overall, the results define the current capability boundary of LLM reasoning in combinatorial optimization: leading models can reconstruct optimal schedules directly from natural language, but most still struggle with precise timing, data transfer arithmetic, and dependency enforcement. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs as explainable co-pilots for optimization and decision-support tasks rather than autonomous solvers.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Ethical AI: Towards Defining a Collective Evaluation Framework

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming sectors such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems, offering powerful tools for innovation. Yet its rapid integration raises urgent ethical concerns related to data ownership, privacy, and systemic bias. Issues like opaque decision-making, misleading outputs, and unfair treatment in high-stakes domains underscore the need for transparent and accountable AI systems. This article addresses these challenges by proposing a modular ethical assessment framework built on ontological blocks of meaning-discrete, interpretable units that encode ethical principles such as fairness, accountability, and ownership. By integrating these blocks with FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles, the framework supports scalable, transparent, and legally aligned ethical evaluations, including compliance with the EU AI Act. Using a real-world use case in AI-powered investor profiling, the paper demonstrates how the framework enables dynamic, behavior-informed risk classification. The findings suggest that ontological blocks offer a promising path toward explainable and auditable AI ethics, though challenges remain in automation and probabilistic reasoning.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Performance Analysis of Convolutional Neural Network By Applying Unconstrained Binary Quadratic Programming

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are pivotal in computer vision and Big Data analytics but demand significant computational resources when trained on large-scale datasets. Conventional training via back-propagation (BP) with losses like Mean Squared Error or Cross-Entropy often requires extensive iterations and may converge sub-optimally. Quantum computing offers a promising alternative by leveraging superposition, tunneling, and entanglement to search complex optimization landscapes more efficiently. In this work, we propose a hybrid optimization method that combines an Unconstrained Binary Quadratic Programming (UBQP) formulation with Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) to accelerate CNN training. Evaluated on the MNIST dataset, our approach achieves a 10--15\% accuracy improvement over a standard BP-CNN baseline while maintaining similar execution times. These results illustrate the potential of hybrid quantum-classical techniques in High-Performance Computing (HPC) environments for Big Data and Deep Learning. Fully realizing these benefits, however, requires a careful alignment of algorithmic structures with underlying quantum mechanisms.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

GrapheonRL: A Graph Neural Network and Reinforcement Learning Framework for Constraint and Data-Aware Workflow Mapping and Scheduling in Heterogeneous HPC Systems

Effective resource utilization and decreased makespan in heterogeneous High Performance Computing (HPC) environments are key benefits of workload mapping and scheduling. Tools such as Snakemake, a workflow management solution, employ Integer Linear Programming (ILP) and heuristic techniques to deploy workflows in various HPC environments like SLURM (Simple Linux Utility for Resource Management) or Kubernetes. Its scheduler factors in workflow task dependencies, resource requirements, and individual task data sizes before system deployment. ILP offers optimal solutions respecting constraints, but only for smaller workflows. Meanwhile, meta-heuristics and heuristics offer faster, though suboptimal, makespan. As problem sizes, system constraints, and complexities evolve, maintaining these schedulers becomes challenging. In this study, we propose a novel solution that integrates Graph Neural Network (GNN) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) to flexibly handle workflows, dynamic constraints, and heterogeneous resources while providing quick responses. GNN manages dependencies and resource requirements, and RL optimizes scheduling decision-making via a learned policy, overcoming the need for a comprehensive global search. Experimental results with different datasets demonstrate that this method effectively adapts to different workflows, adheres to HPC constraints, and offers optimal solutions akin to ILP but with drastically reduced execution times (76 percent faster), comparable to heuristic methods (only 3.85 times slower than OLB). Our contribution is to provide a robust yet scalable mapping and scheduling solution that can handle changing constraints, as well as workload sizes and complexities in a heterogeneous HPC Compute Continuum system landscape.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Workflow-Driven Modeling for the Compute Continuum: An Optimization Approach to Automated System and Workload Scheduling

The convergence of IoT, Edge, Cloud, and HPC technologies creates a compute continuum that merges cloud scalability and flexibility with HPC's computational power and specialized optimizations. However, integrating cloud and HPC resources often introduces latency and communication overhead, which can hinder the performance of tightly coupled parallel applications. Additionally, achieving seamless interoperability between cloud and on-premises HPC systems requires advanced scheduling, resource management, and data transfer protocols. Consequently, users must manually allocate complex workloads across heterogeneous resources, leading to suboptimal task placement and reduced efficiency due to the absence of an automated scheduling mechanism. To overcome these challenges, we introduce a comprehensive framework based on rigorous system and workload modeling for the compute continuum. Our method employs established tools and techniques to optimize workload mapping and scheduling, enabling the automatic orchestration of tasks across both cloud and HPC infrastructures. Experimental evaluations reveal that our approach could optimally improve scheduling efficiency, reducing execution times, and enhancing resource utilization. Specifically, our MILP-based solution achieves optimal scheduling and makespan for small-scale workflows, while heuristic methods offer up to 99% faster estimations for large-scale workflows, albeit with a 5-10% deviation from optimal results. Our primary contribution is a robust system and workload modeling framework that addresses critical gaps in existing tools, paving the way for fully automated orchestration in HPC-compute continuum environments.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

A Review of Tools and Techniques for Optimization of Workload Mapping and Scheduling in Heterogeneous HPC System

This paper presents a systematic review of mapping and scheduling strategies within the High-Performance Computing (HPC) compute continuum, with a particular emphasis on heterogeneous systems. It introduces a prototype workflow to establish foundational concepts in workload characterization and resource allocation. Building on this, a thorough analysis of 66 selected research papers - spanning the period from 2017 to 2024 - is conducted, evaluating contemporary tools and techniques used for workload mapping and scheduling. The review highlights that conventional Job Shop scheduling formulations often lack the expressiveness required to model the complexity of modern HPC data centers effectively. It also reaffirms the classification of HPC scheduling problems as NP-hard, due to their combinatorial nature and the diversity of system and workload constraints. The analysis reveals a prevailing reliance on heuristic and meta-heuristic strategies, including nature-inspired, evolutionary, sorting, and search algorithms. To bridge the observed gaps, the study advocates for hybrid optimization approaches that strategically integrate heuristics, meta-heuristics, machine learning, and emerging quantum computing techniques. Such integration, when tailored to specific problem domains, holds promise for significantly improving the scalability, efficiency, and adaptability of workload optimization in heterogeneous HPC environments.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

AI Work Quantization Model: Closed-System AI Computational Effort Metric

The rapid adoption of AI-driven automation in IoT environments, particularly in smart cities and industrial systems, necessitates a standardized approach to quantify AIs computational workload. Existing methodologies lack a consistent framework for measuring AI computational effort across diverse architectures, posing challenges in fair taxation models and energy-aware workload assessments. This study introduces the Closed-System AI Computational Effort Metric, a theoretical framework that quantifies real-time computational effort by incorporating input/output complexity, execution dynamics, and hardware-specific performance factors. The model ensures comparability between AI workloads across traditional CPUs and modern GPU/TPU accelerators, facilitating standardized performance evaluations. Additionally, we propose an energy-aware extension to assess AIs environmental impact, enabling sustainability-focused AI optimizations and equitable taxation models. Our findings establish a direct correlation between AI workload and human productivity, where 5 AI Workload Units equate to approximately 60 to 72 hours of human labor, exceeding a full-time workweek. By systematically linking AI computational effort to human labor, this framework enhances the understanding of AIs role in workforce automation, industrial efficiency, and sustainable computing. Future work will focus on refining the model through dynamic workload adaptation, complexity normalization, and energy-aware AI cost estimation, further broadening its applicability in diverse AI-driven ecosystems.

cs.PF↗

arXiv2024

A comparison of HPC-based quantum computing simulators using Quantum Volume

This paper compares quantum computing simulators running on a single CPU or GPU-based HPC node using the Quantum Volume benchmark commonly proposed for comparing NISQ systems. As simulators do not suffer from noise, the metric used in the comparison is the time required to simulate a set Quantum Volume. The results are important to estimate the feasibility of proof of concept studies and debugging of quantum algorithms on HPC systems. Besides benchmarks of some commonly used simulators, this paper also offers an overview of their main features, a review of the state of quantum computing simulation and quantum computing benchmarking, and some insight into the theory of Quantum Volume.

quant-ph↗