Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Abdelmadjid Boudaoud

Publications and source records attributed to Abdelmadjid Boudaoud.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Diophantine approximation with improvement of the simultaneous control of the error and of the denominator

In this work we proof the following theorem which is, in addition to someother lemmas, our main result:\noindent \textbf{theorem}. Let$\ X=\{ ( x\_{1}\text{, }%t\_{1}) \text{, }( x\_{2}\text{, }t\_{2}) \text{, ..., }(x\_{n}\text{, }t\_{n})\} $ be a finite part of $\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{R}^{\ast +}$, then there exist a finite part $R$ of $\mathbb{R}%^{\ast +}$ such that for all $\varepsilon > 0$ there exists $r\in R$ such that if $0 < \varepsilon \leq r$ then there exist rational numbers $( \dfrac{p\_{i}}{q}) \_{i=1,2,...,n}$ such that:\{c}| x\_{i}-\dfrac{p\_{i}}{q}| \leq \varepsilon t\_{i} \varepsilon q\leq t\_{i}|\text{, }i=1,2,...,n\text{.} \tag{*}\noindent It is clear that the condition $\varepsilon q\leq t\_{i}$ for $%i=1,2,...,n$ is equivalent to $\varepsilon q\leq t=\underset{i=1,2,...,n}{Min%}$ $( t\_{i}) $.\ Also, we have (*) for all $\varepsilon $verifying $0 < \varepsilon \leq \varepsilon \_{0}=\min R$.The previous theorem is the classical equivalent of the following one whichis formulated in the context of the nonstandard analysis ($[ 2] $%, $[ 5] $, $[ 6] $, $[ 8] $).\noindent \textbf{theorem. }For every positive infinitesimal real $\varepsilon$, there exists an unlimited integer $q$ depending only of $\varepsilon $, such that $\forall ^{st}x \in \mathbb{R}\ \exists p_{x} \in \mathbb{Z}$ $:\{ \{ccc}x & = \& \dfrac{p_{x}}{q}+\varepsilon ϕ\varepsilon q \& \cong \& 0.$ For this reason, to prove the nonstandard version of the main result and to get its classical version we place ourselves in the context of the nonstandard analysis.

math.NT↗

A nonstandard proof for Szpilrajn's theorem

Recall that Szpilrajn (1930) ([4], [5]) states that on a given set, any partial order can be extended to a total order on the same set. In this work we give, in the context of the IST theory ([2],[3],[6]), a more constructive proof for this theorem. In addition, we benefit of the tools used to give some other results.

math.LO↗