arXiv subjects

Abhijeet Sadashiv Gangan

Publications and source records attributed to Abhijeet Sadashiv Gangan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Dyna-Mat: End-to-end benchmarking of foundation machine learning interatomic potentials in finite-temperature ensembles

Foundation machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are increasingly being used as drop-in replacements for first-principles calculations, enabling simulations of materials at length and time scales that were previously inaccessible. However, due to lack of ground truth data, their accuracy on structural and dynamical observables in finite thermodynamic ensembles is yet to be established. Here, we introduce Dyna-Mat-v1.0, a benchmark dataset of condensed-phase first-principles molecular dynamics trajectories designed to test foundation MLIPs at realistic finite-temperature conditions. Using this dataset, we evaluate 15 foundation MLIPs across four model tiers by comparing both single-point energy and force errors on first-principles configurations and observables generated from MLIP-driven trajectories. We find that "on average" models with lower single-point force errors also yield lower errors for structural and dynamical observables. However, there are individual systems for which low force errors lead to qualitative failures in the predicted structure. Pressure remains poorly described across most models, pointing to limitations in the density functional theory stress labels available in current large-scale training datasets. Finally, we construct an accuracy-cost Pareto frontier to identify the best trade-offs for molecular dynamics with foundation MLIPs, finding that the latest generation of cross-trained models is close to Pareto-optimal according to the accuracy metrics considered here. Overall, Dyna-Mat-v1.0 shows that end-to-end finite-temperature validation is essential for quantifying the predictive behaviour of foundation MLIPs, and provides a simple, scalable route for assessing them beyond static and harmonic benchmarks relevant to materials design.

cond-mat.mtrl-sci↗

arXiv2026

Electronic structure prediction of medium and high entropy alloys across composition space

We propose machine learning (ML) models to predict the electron density -- the fundamental unknown of a material's ground state -- across the composition space of concentrated alloys. From this, other physical properties can be inferred, enabling accelerated exploration. A significant challenge is that the number of sampled compositions and descriptors required to accurately predict fields like the electron density increases rapidly with species. To address this, we employ Bayesian Active Learning (AL), which minimizes training data requirements by leveraging uncertainty quantification capabilities of Bayesian Neural Networks. Compared to strategic tessellation of the composition space, Bayesian-AL reduces the number of training data points by a factor of 2.5 for ternary (SiGeSn) and 1.7 for quaternary (CrFeCoNi) systems. We also introduce easy-to-optimize, body-attached-frame descriptors, which respect physical symmetries and maintain approximately the same descriptor-vector size as alloy elements increase. Our ML models demonstrate high accuracy and generalizability in predicting both electron density and energy across composition space.

cond-mat.mtrl-sci↗

arXiv2025

Reflections from the 2024 Large Language Model (LLM) Hackathon for Applications in Materials Science and Chemistry

Here, we present the outcomes from the second Large Language Model (LLM) Hackathon for Applications in Materials Science and Chemistry, which engaged participants across global hybrid locations, resulting in 34 team submissions. The submissions spanned seven key application areas and demonstrated the diverse utility of LLMs for applications in (1) molecular and material property prediction; (2) molecular and material design; (3) automation and novel interfaces; (4) scientific communication and education; (5) research data management and automation; (6) hypothesis generation and evaluation; and (7) knowledge extraction and reasoning from scientific literature. Each team submission is presented in a summary table with links to the code and as brief papers in the appendix. Beyond team results, we discuss the hackathon event and its hybrid format, which included physical hubs in Toronto, Montreal, San Francisco, Berlin, Lausanne, and Tokyo, alongside a global online hub to enable local and virtual collaboration. Overall, the event highlighted significant improvements in LLM capabilities since the previous year's hackathon, suggesting continued expansion of LLMs for applications in materials science and chemistry research. These outcomes demonstrate the dual utility of LLMs as both multipurpose models for diverse machine learning tasks and platforms for rapid prototyping custom applications in scientific research.

cs.LG↗