SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Adam Finnemann

Publications and source records attributed to Adam Finnemann.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Blume-Capel model: Estimation of a three stable state network for $-\bf 1$, $\bf 0$ and $\bf +1$ data

An extension of the Ising model is proposed as a viable alternative for data with values $-1$, $0$ and $+1$ in the inverse problem, i.e., estimation of the parameters. This model is called the Blume-Capel (BC) model, adapted from physics for small networks. The advantage of the BC model is not only the fact that it is possible to have a neutral (centrist) position on the response scale, but also that this model allows for three stable states. We illustrate magnetisation properties of the BC model using simulations and mean field results. For estimation of the BC parameters, we show that the BC model is part of the exponential family of distributions and show that the model is identified, except for the (inverse) temperature. We then show that combining pseudo-likelihood with lasso yields accurate parameter recovery for the BC model, even in small networks. Moreover, confidence intervals with good coverage properties can be obtained using the desparsified lasso together with sandwich and shrinkage techniques. We apply the methods to data obtained from the online platform \textit{Stemwijzer}, intended to aid people in deciding for whom to vote.

stat.AP

Fair coins tend to land on the same side they started: Evidence from 350,757 flips

Many people have flipped coins but few have stopped to ponder the statistical and physical intricacies of the process. We collected $350{,}757$ coin flips to test the counterintuitive prediction from a physics model of human coin tossing developed by Diaconis, Holmes, and Montgomery (DHM; 2007). The model asserts that when people flip an ordinary coin, it tends to land on the same side it started -- DHM estimated the probability of a same-side outcome to be about 51\%. Our data lend strong support to this precise prediction: the coins landed on the same side more often than not, $\text{Pr}(\text{same side}) = 0.508$, 95\% credible interval (CI) [$0.506$, $0.509$], $\text{BF}_{\text{same-side bias}} = 2359$. Furthermore, the data revealed considerable between-people variation in the degree of this same-side bias. Our data also confirmed the generic prediction that when people flip an ordinary coin -- with the initial side-up randomly determined -- it is equally likely to land heads or tails: $\text{Pr}(\text{heads}) = 0.500$, 95\% CI [$0.498$, $0.502$], $\text{BF}_{\text{heads-tails bias}} = 0.182$. Furthermore, this lack of heads-tails bias does not appear to vary across coins. Additional analyses revealed that the within-people same-side bias decreased as more coins were flipped, an effect that is consistent with the possibility that practice makes people flip coins in a less wobbly fashion. Our data therefore provide strong evidence that when some (but not all) people flip a fair coin, it tends to land on the same side it started.

math.HO