arXiv subjects

Aditya Parashar

Publications and source records attributed to Aditya Parashar.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Concordance-Optimal Continuous Music Emotion Estimation: Variance Decomposition, Dual-Branch Temporal Fusion, and Conformal Prediction Intervals

Continuous music emotion recognition (MER) estimates how Arousal and Valence evolve within a song, yet the field's standard metric, pooled frame-level correlation, is dominated by between-song differences and cannot distinguish a model that tracks emotional dynamics from one that only ranks songs by their average level. We decompose annotation variance into between- and within-song components and show that mean squared error (MSE) targets the former, while windowed Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC = $r \cdot C_b$) targets the latter by penalising the variance compression MSE induces. A single weight $λ$ controls the trade-off: on 1,764 DEAM songs, raising $λ$ from 0 to 1 lowers pooled Arousal $r$ from 0.843 to 0.810 while raising mean within-song $r$ from 0.204 to 0.368. Building on this objective, we present MMAS (Multimodal Music Analysis System), an open-source model that predicts Arousal and Valence every 0.5 s from raw audio. It fuses frozen MERT-v1-95M embeddings with ten symbolic features from automatic transcription through a dual-branch temporal convolutional network with cross-modal attention. Because both branches are audio-derived, one model trains jointly on DEAM and PMEmo without domain conditioning. Under song-grouped 5-fold cross-validation (2,531 songs), pooled $r$ reaches 0.801/0.685 (Arousal/Valence) on DEAM and 0.742/0.746 on PMEmo. Against a ridge baseline on identical features, within-song Arousal $r$ roughly triples (0.344 vs. 0.125; $n = 353$ songs, Wilcoxon $p = 1.7 \times 10^{-21}$, $d = 0.56$). Complete transcription failure costs at most 0.04 pooled $r$. Split-conformal intervals attain 93.7% (Arousal) and 90.0% (Valence) marginal coverage at a 95% target, with the shortfall traced to within-song dependence. MMAS is released as a pip-installable package.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

AutoDiscovery: Open-ended Scientific Discovery via Bayesian Surprise

The promise of autonomous scientific discovery (ASD) hinges not only on answering questions, but also on knowing which questions to ask. Most recent works in ASD explore the use of large language models (LLMs) in goal-driven settings, relying on human-specified research questions to guide hypothesis generation. However, scientific discovery may be accelerated further by allowing the AI system to drive exploration by its own criteria. The few existing approaches in open-ended ASD select hypotheses based on diversity heuristics or subjective proxies for human interestingness, but the former struggles to meaningfully navigate the typically vast hypothesis space, and the latter suffers from imprecise definitions. This paper presents AutoDiscovery -- a method for open-ended ASD that instead drives scientific exploration using Bayesian surprise. Here, we quantify the epistemic shift from the LLM's prior beliefs about a hypothesis to its posterior beliefs after gathering experimental results. To efficiently explore the space of nested hypotheses, our method employs a Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) strategy with progressive widening using surprisal as the reward function. We evaluate AutoDiscovery in the setting of data-driven discovery across 21 real-world datasets spanning domains such as biology, economics, finance, and behavioral science. Our results demonstrate that under a fixed budget, AutoDiscovery substantially outperforms competitors by producing 5-29% more discoveries deemed surprising by the LLM. Our human evaluation further reveals that two-thirds of discoveries made by our system are surprising to domain experts as well, suggesting this is an important step towards building open-ended ASD systems.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Datasheets Aren't Enough: DataRubrics for Automated Quality Metrics and Accountability

High-quality datasets are fundamental to training and evaluating machine learning models, yet their creation-especially with accurate human annotations-remains a significant challenge. Many dataset paper submissions lack originality, diversity, or rigorous quality control, and these shortcomings are often overlooked during peer review. Submissions also frequently omit essential details about dataset construction and properties. While existing tools such as datasheets aim to promote transparency, they are largely descriptive and do not provide standardized, measurable methods for evaluating data quality. Similarly, metadata requirements at conferences promote accountability but are inconsistently enforced. To address these limitations, this position paper advocates for the integration of systematic, rubric-based evaluation metrics into the dataset review process-particularly as submission volumes continue to grow. We also explore scalable, cost-effective methods for synthetic data generation, including dedicated tools and LLM-as-a-judge approaches, to support more efficient evaluation. As a call to action, we introduce DataRubrics, a structured framework for assessing the quality of both human- and model-generated datasets. Leveraging recent advances in LLM-based evaluation, DataRubrics offers a reproducible, scalable, and actionable solution for dataset quality assessment, enabling both authors and reviewers to uphold higher standards in data-centric research. We also release code to support reproducibility of LLM-based evaluations at https://github.com/datarubrics/datarubrics.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Quasi-random Multi-Sample Inference for Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) are often equipped with multi-sample decoding strategies. An LLM implicitly defines an arithmetic code book, facilitating efficient and embarrassingly parallelizable \textbf{arithmetic sampling} to produce multiple samples using quasi-random codes. Traditional text generation methods, such as beam search and sampling-based techniques, have notable limitations: they lack parallelizability or diversity of sampled sequences. This study explores the potential of arithmetic sampling, contrasting it with ancestral sampling across two decoding tasks that employ multi-sample inference: chain-of-thought reasoning with self-consistency and machine translation with minimum Bayes risk decoding. Our results demonstrate that arithmetic sampling produces more diverse samples, significantly improving reasoning and translation performance as the sample size increases. We observe a $\mathbf{3\text{-}5\%}$ point increase in accuracy on the GSM8K dataset and a $\mathbf{0.45\text{-}0.89\%}$ point increment in COMET score for WMT19 tasks using arithmetic sampling without any significant computational overhead.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

MCQG-SRefine: Multiple Choice Question Generation and Evaluation with Iterative Self-Critique, Correction, and Comparison Feedback

Automatic question generation (QG) is essential for AI and NLP, particularly in intelligent tutoring, dialogue systems, and fact verification. Generating multiple-choice questions (MCQG) for professional exams, like the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), is particularly challenging, requiring domain expertise and complex multi-hop reasoning for high-quality questions. However, current large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 struggle with professional MCQG due to outdated knowledge, hallucination issues, and prompt sensitivity, resulting in unsatisfactory quality and difficulty. To address these challenges, we propose MCQG-SRefine, an LLM self-refine-based (Critique and Correction) framework for converting medical cases into high-quality USMLE-style questions. By integrating expert-driven prompt engineering with iterative self-critique and self-correction feedback, MCQG-SRefine significantly enhances human expert satisfaction regarding both the quality and difficulty of the questions. Furthermore, we introduce an LLM-as-Judge-based automatic metric to replace the complex and costly expert evaluation process, ensuring reliable and expert-aligned assessments.

cs.CL↗