SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Aiden Gundersen

Publications and source records attributed to Aiden Gundersen.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Pulsar Timing Array Sensitivity to Anisotropy: Empirical Sensitivity Curves, Scaling Relations, and the Multi-Resolution Pixel Basis

We quantify pulsar timing array (PTA) sensitivity to anisotropy in the gravitational wave background using the cross-correlation based Fisher information matrix in the pixel and spherical harmonic bases. We use a set of simulations to empirically determine scaling relations of a PTA's sensitivity to anisotropy with the number of pulsars $N_\mathrm{psr}$ in the array, the error $\delta t$ on the times of arrival, the frequency $f_\mathrm{GW}$ of the gravitational waves, and the angular scale $\Delta\Omega$ of the anisotropy. The sensitivity scales approximately as $N_\mathrm{psr}^{0.8}$, $\delta t^{-0.08}$, and $\Delta\Omega^{1.6}-\Delta\Omega^{2.1}$ (depending on the ranges of $\ell$ and $m$ under consideration). In addition, we use realistic simulations to project the NANOGrav PTA sensitivity to a 30-year baseline and quantify the growth in sensitivity at several timeslices. Except at the lowest frequencies, we find negligible effect on sensitivity through increasing the observation duration only. Finally, we introduce a multi-resolution pixel basis motivated by the large dependence of the sensitivity on sky location, and demonstrate the operation of the basis through a set of injections and recoveries.

astro-ph.IM

A new framework for lightning-fast gravitational wave analysis of pulsar timing data

Pulsar timing array data analysis is computationally expensive, limiting the complexity of models which can be studied. As pulsar timing datasets and their respective models grow in size and sophistication, faster and scalable inference methods are essential. In this paper, we accelerate pulsar timing analyses by sampling in the space of Fourier coefficients instead of analytically marginalizing over them. Previous studies have shown the Fourier space induces a complex, high-dimensional posterior geometry, from which it is generally difficult to sample. We show that under an appropriate coordinate transformation the Fourier coefficients approximately follow a standard normal distribution, and may be efficiently sampled using a Hamiltonian Monte Carlo scheme. Under this coordinate transformation, for datasets of size and complexity comparable to the NANOGrav 15-year release, the new method produces converged posterior distributions for a range of models which include inter-pulsar correlations, stochastic, and deterministic signals in approximately 15 minutes on an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 GPU. By comparison, the legacy pulsar timing analysis software \texttt{ENTERPRISE} would require months of computation on a CPU cluster to analyze comparable datasets under the same joint stochastic and deterministic models.

gr-qc

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Impacts of Customized Chromatic Noise Models on Gravitational Wave Analyses

We report updated nHz gravitational wave (GW) significance, characterization, and interpretations using the customized chromatic-noise models (CNMs) developed in Larsen, Baier et al. (2026). for the NANOGrav 15-year data set. We find increased evidence for the Hellings-Downs (HD) correlation signature of the stochastic gravitational wave background (GWB), with a Bayes factor of $1571\pm14$ for HD-correlations over a common uncorrelated red-noise process using a power-law model with $14$ Fourier modes. We find this $\sim8\times$ increase in Bayes factor from Agazie et al. (2023a) is a result of improved noise mitigation. Assuming an analytic null distribution for the frequentist interpulsar correlation statistic, this corresponds to a slightly more significant measurement from $3.16\sigma$ to $3.32\sigma$ against the no-correlation scenario. Spectral inference with CNMs brings the power-law GWB amplitude down to $A_{\rm GWB} = 2.1^{+0.6}_{-0.5}\times10^{-15}$ at fixed $\gamma_{\rm GWB} = 13/3$. In a varied-$\gamma$ analysis, the spectral index increases to $\gamma_{\rm GWB}=3.5^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$. We report updates on an all-sky continuous gravitational wave (CW) search as well as select targeted searches and calculate a $3.2\times$ larger detection volume for the NANOGrav detector. With CNMs, we find reduced evidence for a non-Einsteinian, scalar-transverse mode of gravity. Finally, we reinterpret the GWB first with the assumption of an astrophysical background sourced by SMBHBs and then assuming the more exotic origins of cosmic inflation, a first-order cosmological phase transition, and stable cosmic strings. Under both the SMBHB hypothesis and the cosmological hypotheses, we see only marginal shifts in model parameter posteriors which are consistent with the slightly quieter and steeper power-law GWB spectrum.

astro-ph.CO

Escaping Neal's Funnel: a multi-stage sampling method for hierarchical models

Neal's funnel refers to an exponential tapering in probability densities common to Bayesian hierarchical models. Usual sampling methods, such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo, struggle to efficiently sample the funnel. Reparameterizing the model or analytically marginalizing local parameters are common techniques to remedy sampling pathologies in distributions exhibiting Neal's funnel. In this paper, we show that the challenges of Neal's funnel can be avoided by performing the hierarchical analysis, well, hierarchically. That is, instead of sampling all parameters of the hierarchical model jointly, we break the sampling into multiple stages. The first stage samples a generalized (higher-dimensional) hierarchical model which is parameterized to lessen the sharpness of the funnel. The next stage samples from the estimated density of the first stage, but under a constraint which restricts the sampling to recover the marginal distributions on the hyper-parameters of the original (lower-dimensional) hierarchical model. A normalizing flow can be used to represent the distribution from the first stage, such that it can easily be sampled from for the second stage of the analysis. This technique is useful when effective reparameterizations are computationally expensive to calculate, or a generalized hierarchical model already exists from which it is easy to sample.

stat.ME

Rapid inference for individual binaries and a stochastic background with pulsar timing array data

The analysis of pulsar timing array data has provided evidence for a gravitational wave background in the nanohertz band. This raises the question of what is the source of the signal, is it astrophysical or cosmological in origin? If the signal originates from a population of supermassive black hole binaries, as is generally assumed, we can expect to see evidence for both anisotropy and to be able to resolve signals from individual binaries as more data are collected. The anisotropy and resolvable systems are caused by a small number of loud signals that stand out from the crowd. Here we focus on the joint detection of individual signals and a stochastic background. While methods have previously been developed to perform such an analysis, they are currently held back by the cost of computing the joint likelihood function. Each individual source is described by $N=8+2N_p$ parameters, where $N_p$ are the number of pulsars in the array. With the latest combined datasets having over one hundred pulsars, the parameter space is very large, and consequently, it takes a large number of likelihood evaluations to explore these models. Here we present a new approach that extends the Fourier basis method, previously introduced to accelerate analyses for stochastic signals, to also include deterministic signals. Key elements of the method are that the likelihood evaluations are per-pulsar, avoiding expensive operations on large matrices, and the templates for individual binaries can be computed analytically or using fast Fourier methods on a sparsely sampled grid of time samples. This analysis method scales better than quadratically with the size of the dataset, while the approach currently being used in most analyses scales quartically or worse with the number of data points. As datasets grow with more observations, this analysis will be orders of magnitude faster than previous approaches.

gr-qc