arXiv subjects

Alceu Bissoto

Publications and source records attributed to Alceu Bissoto.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2019

The Six Fronts of the Generative Adversarial Networks

Generative Adversarial Networks fostered a newfound interest in generative models, resulting in a swelling wave of new works that new-coming researchers may find formidable to surf. In this paper, we intend to help those researchers, by splitting that incoming wave into six "fronts": Architectural Contributions, Conditional Techniques, Normalization and Constraint Contributions, Loss Functions, Image-to-image Translations, and Validation Metrics. The division in fronts organizes literature into approachable blocks, ultimately communicating to the reader how the area is evolving. Previous surveys in the area, which this works also tabulates, focus on a few of those fronts, leaving a gap that we propose to fill with a more integrated, comprehensive overview. Here, instead of an exhaustive survey, we opt for a straightforward review: our target is to be an entry point to this vast literature, and also to be able to update experienced researchers to the newest techniques.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2019

(De)Constructing Bias on Skin Lesion Datasets

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer. Automated skin lesion analysis plays an important role for early detection. Nowadays, the ISIC Archive and the Atlas of Dermoscopy dataset are the most employed skin lesion sources to benchmark deep-learning based tools. However, all datasets contain biases, often unintentional, due to how they were acquired and annotated. Those biases distort the performance of machine-learning models, creating spurious correlations that the models can unfairly exploit, or, contrarily destroying cogent correlations that the models could learn. In this paper, we propose a set of experiments that reveal both types of biases, positive and negative, in existing skin lesion datasets. Our results show that models can correctly classify skin lesion images without clinically-meaningful information: disturbingly, the machine-learning model learned over images where no information about the lesion remains, presents an accuracy above the AI benchmark curated with dermatologists' performances. That strongly suggests spurious correlations guiding the models. We fed models with additional clinically meaningful information, which failed to improve the results even slightly, suggesting the destruction of cogent correlations. Our main findings raise awareness of the limitations of models trained and evaluated in small datasets such as the ones we evaluated, and may suggest future guidelines for models intended for real-world deployment.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2019

Skin Lesion Synthesis with Generative Adversarial Networks

Skin cancer is by far the most common type of cancer. Early detection is the key to increase the chances for successful treatment significantly. Currently, Deep Neural Networks are the state-of-the-art results on automated skin cancer classification. To push the results further, we need to address the lack of annotated data, which is expensive and require much effort from specialists. To bypass this problem, we propose using Generative Adversarial Networks for generating realistic synthetic skin lesion images. To the best of our knowledge, our results are the first to show visually-appealing synthetic images that comprise clinically-meaningful information.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2018

Deep-Learning Ensembles for Skin-Lesion Segmentation, Analysis, Classification: RECOD Titans at ISIC Challenge 2018

This extended abstract describes the participation of RECOD Titans in parts 1 to 3 of the ISIC Challenge 2018 "Skin Lesion Analysis Towards Melanoma Detection" (MICCAI 2018). Although our team has a long experience with melanoma classification and moderate experience with lesion segmentation, the ISIC Challenge 2018 was the very first time we worked on lesion attribute detection. For each task we submitted 3 different ensemble approaches, varying combinations of models and datasets. Our best results on the official testing set, regarding the official metric of each task, were: 0.728 (segmentation), 0.344 (attribute detection) and 0.803 (classification). Those submissions reached, respectively, the 56th, 14th and 9th places.

cs.CV↗