arXiv2022
Consider a regular domain $Ω\subset \mathbb{R}^N$ and let $d(x)=\operatorname{dist}(x,\partialΩ)$. Denote $L^{1,\infty}_a(Ω)$ the space of functions from $L^{1,\infty}(Ω)$ having absolutely continuous quasinorms. This set is essentially smaller than $L^{1,\infty}(Ω)$ but, at the same time, essentially larger than a union of all $L^{1,q}(Ω)$, $q\in[1,\infty)$. A classical result of late 1980's states that for $p\in (1,\infty)$ and $m \in \mathbb{N}$, $u$ belongs to the Sobolev space $W^{m,p}_0(Ω)$ if and only if $u/d^m\in L^p(Ω)$ and $\left|\nabla^m u\right|\in L^p(Ω)$. During the consequent decades, several authors have spent considerable effort in order to relax the characterizing condition. Recently, it was proved that $u\in W^{m,p}_0(Ω)$ if and only if $u/d^m\in L^1(Ω)$ and $\left|\nabla^m u\right|\in L^p(Ω)$. In this paper we show that for $N\geq1$ and $p\in(1,\infty)$ we have $u\in W^{1,p}_0(Ω)$ if and only if $u/d\in L^{1,\infty}_a(Ω)$ and $\left|\nabla u\right|\in L^p(Ω)$. Moreover, we present a counterexample which demonstrates that after relaxing the condition $u/d\in L^{1,\infty}_a(Ω)$ to $u/d\in L^{1,\infty}(Ω)$ the equivalence no longer holds.