arXiv subjects

Alessandra Tappini

Publications and source records attributed to Alessandra Tappini.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2018

(k,p)-Planarity: A Relaxation of Hybrid Planarity

We present a new model for hybrid planarity that relaxes existing hybrid representations. A graph $G = (V,E)$ is $(k,p)$-planar if $V$ can be partitioned into clusters of size at most $k$ such that $G$ admits a drawing where: (i) each cluster is associated with a closed, bounded planar region, called a cluster region; (ii) cluster regions are pairwise disjoint, (iii) each vertex $v \in V$ is identified with at most $p$ distinct points, called \emph{ports}, on the boundary of its cluster region; (iv) each inter-cluster edge $(u,v) \in E$ is identified with a Jordan arc connecting a port of $u$ to a port of $v$; (v) inter-cluster edges do not cross or intersect cluster regions except at their endpoints. We first tightly bound the number of edges in a $(k,p)$-planar graph with $p<k$. We then prove that $(4,1)$-planarity testing and $(2,2)$-planarity testing are NP-complete problems. Finally, we prove that neither the class of $(2,2)$-planar graphs nor the class of $1$-planar graphs contains the other, indicating that the $(k,p)$-planar graphs are a large and novel class.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

Pole Dancing: 3D Morphs for Tree Drawings

We study the question whether a crossing-free 3D morph between two straight-line drawings of an $n$-vertex tree can be constructed consisting of a small number of linear morphing steps. We look both at the case in which the two given drawings are two-dimensional and at the one in which they are three-dimensional. In the former setting we prove that a crossing-free 3D morph always exists with $O(\log n)$ steps, while for the latter $Θ(n)$ steps are always sufficient and sometimes necessary.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2018

Turning Cliques into Paths to Achieve Planarity

Motivated by hybrid graph representations, we introduce and study the following beyond-planarity problem, which we call $h$-Clique2Path Planarity: Given a graph $G$, whose vertices are partitioned into subsets of size at most $h$, each inducing a clique, remove edges from each clique so that the subgraph induced by each subset is a path, in such a way that the resulting subgraph of $G$ is planar. We study this problem when $G$ is a simple topological graph, and establish its complexity in relation to $k$-planarity. We prove that $h$-Clique2Path Planarity is NP-complete even when $h=4$ and $G$ is a simple $3$-plane graph, while it can be solved in linear time, for any $h$, when $G$ is $1$-plane.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

Ortho-polygon Visibility Representations of 3-connected 1-plane Graphs

An ortho-polygon visibility representation $Γ$ of a $1$-plane graph $G$ (OPVR of $G$) is an embedding preserving drawing that maps each vertex of $G$ to a distinct orthogonal polygon and each edge of $G$ to a vertical or horizontal visibility between its end-vertices. The representation $Γ$ has vertex complexity $k$ if every polygon of $Γ$ has at most $k$ reflex corners. It is known that $3$-connected $1$-plane graphs admit an OPVR with vertex complexity at most twelve, while vertex complexity at least two may be required in some cases. In this paper, we reduce this gap by showing that vertex complexity five is always sufficient, while vertex complexity four may be required in some cases. These results are based on the study of the combinatorial properties of the B-, T-, and W-configurations in $3$-connected $1$-plane graphs. An implication of the upper bound is the existence of a $\tilde{O}(n^\frac{10}{7})$-time drawing algorithm that computes an OPVR of an $n$-vertex $3$-connected $1$-plane graph on an integer grid of size $O(n) \times O(n)$ and with vertex complexity at most five.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

A Matrix Approach for Weighted Argumentation Frameworks: a Preliminary Report

The assignment of weights to attacks in a classical Argumentation Framework allows to compute semantics by taking into account the different importance of each argument. We represent a Weighted Argumentation Framework by a non-binary matrix, and we characterize the basic extensions (such as w-admissible, w- stable, w-complete) by analysing sub-blocks of this matrix. Also, we show how to reduce the matrix into another one of smaller size, that is equivalent to the original one for the determination of extensions. Furthermore, we provide two algorithms that allow to build incrementally w-grounded and w-preferred extensions starting from a w-admissible extension.

cs.AI↗