SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Alessandro Pionati

Publications and source records attributed to Alessandro Pionati.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Grouped fixed effects regularization for binary choice models

We study the application of the grouped fixed effects approach to binary choice models for panel data in presence of severe complete separation. Through data loss, complete separation may lead to biased estimates of Average Partial Effects and imprecise inference. Moreover, forecasts are not available for units without variability in the response configuration. The grouped fixed effects approach discretizes unobserved heterogeneity via k-means clustering, thus reducing the number of fixed effects to estimate. This regularization reduces complete separation, since it relies on within-cluster rather than within-subject response transitions. Drawing from asymptotic theory for the APEs, we propose choosing a number of groups such that clustering delivers a good approximation of the latent trait while keeping the incidental parameters problem under control. The simulation results show that the proposed approach delivers unbiased estimates and reliable inference for the APEs. Two empirical applications illustrate the sensitivity of the results to the choice of the number of groups and how nontrivial forecasts for a much larger number of units can be obtained.

econ.EM

Specification testing with grouped fixed effects

We propose a Hausman test for the correct specification of unobserved heterogeneity in both linear and nonlinear fixed-effects panel data models. The null hypothesis is that heterogeneity is either time-invariant or, symmetrically, described by homogeneous time effects. We contrast the standard one-way fixed-effects estimator with the recently developed two-way grouped fixed-effects estimator, that is consistent in the presence of time-varying heterogeneity (or heterogeneous time effects) under minimal specification and distributional assumptions for the unobserved effects. The Hausman test compares jackknife corrected estimators, removing the leading term of the incidental parameters and approximation biases, and exploits bootstrap to obtain the variance of the vector of contrasts. We provide Monte Carlo evidence on the size and power properties of the test and illustrate its application in two empirical settings.

econ.EM