Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Aletta Johanna Blanken

Publications and source records attributed to Aletta Johanna Blanken.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

MemLeak: Cross-User Semantic Leakage in Multi-Tenant AI Agent Memory

Personal AI agents in enterprise multi-tenant deployments share a common vector store for long-term memory. Shared embedding spaces create a surface for cross-user memory leakage: a user's query can retrieve semantically adjacent memories belonging to another user through ordinary cosine-similarity retrieval, without any exploit. We formalize this as cross-user admissibility failure and evaluate it across six experiments, plus follow-up ablations, under both sparse (TF-IDF) and production-faithful (MiniLM-L6-v2) retrieval. Non-adversarial, incidental leakage reaches 70--100\% under pooled {same-team} retrieval; adversarially crafted memories achieve 90--100\% top-$k$ placement, exceeding weaker keyword-based attacker baselines, with score lifts of $+0.416$ to $+0.511$ under production-faithful dense retrieval (Config B); and end-to-end response contamination reaches 5.00/5 under a production retrieval path and 4.67/5 with Claude Sonnet~4.5, with contaminated responses often scoring as helpful or more helpful than clean ones, a gap validated against human judgment. Among three architectural mitigations, only hard post-retrieval ownership gating consistently restores the clean baseline (1.00/5) across {two generation models, at a measured latency overhead of roughly 1.4~ms per query.

cs.AI↗

When Error Mitigation Makes Things Worse: Budget-Aware Evaluation, Extrapolation Failure, and the Calibration Trust Boundary

Error mitigation is expected to turn noisy quantum measurements into more useful estimates. We show that it can instead amplify error. Under control-offset miscalibration, the evaluated unconstrained zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) estimators are worse than no mitigation on 38-63% of simulated instances and produce extreme tail errors. A small IBM Heron study finds worsening on 80-88% of 18 instances across two depths, with mean error 3.0-4.1 times the raw error. In simulation, the median changes little, so median-only monitoring misses the failures. We then compare methods at the same online shot budget per evaluation and report offline training cost separately. After that cost is amortized, a budget-conditioned neural corrector occupies the low-budget end of the simulated accuracy-cost frontier and falls back to the raw estimate when an ensemble disagrees; its hardware transfer remains unsuccessful. Finally, we treat provider-reported calibration as an input that is not bound to the execution-time device state. A white-box projected-gradient stress test on this metadata increases the corrector's error 8.1 times within the feature ranges used for training and evades the disagreement monitor on half of the worsened cases. Together, the results connect budget-aware evaluation, tail risk, and calibration integrity in near-term quantum learning pipelines.

quant-ph↗

Does the Readout Bypass Leak the Input? A Feature-Visibility Audit of Hybrid Quantum-Classical Models

Readout-side residual hybrids concatenate raw inputs with measured quantum features. Under single-example gradient sharing, a biased first linear layer admits standard analytic recovery of its input, so the bypass exposes raw coordinates without requiring inversion of the quantum circuit. We audit this mechanism using two tabular datasets, four architectures, and metrics conditioned on feature visibility. Iterative gradient matching gives median full-record PSNR of 73-96 dB for residual and input-only heads. Quantum-only heads score 8-11 dB on the full record but 54-96 dB on the six input coordinates they actually encode. These are reconstruction results for the tested six-input, six-observable circuits, not a general statement about quantum encodings. A loss-threshold membership attack remains near chance. The contribution is a visibility-conditioned privacy audit: omitted coordinates must not be credited as protection supplied by quantum processing, and near-exact PSNR differences must not be interpreted as meaningful privacy rankings. Our findings concern individual gradients and do not establish leakage under aggregation or multiple local training steps.

quant-ph↗