arXiv subjects

Alex Kim

Publications and source records attributed to Alex Kim.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2017

Accounting for sample selection in Bayesian analyses

Astronomers are often confronted with funky populations and distributions of objects: brighter objects are more likely to be detected; targets are selected based on colour cuts; imperfect classification yields impure samples. Failing to account for these effects leads to biased analyses. In this paper we present a simple overview of a Bayesian consideration of sample selection, giving solutions to both analytically tractable and intractable models. This is accomplished via a combination of analytic approximations and Monte Carlo integration, in which dataset simulation is efficiently used to correct for issues in the observed dataset. This methodology is also applicable for data truncation, such as requiring densities to be strictly positive. Toy models are included for demonstration, along with discussions of numerical considerations and how to optimise for implementation. We provide sample code to demonstrate the techniques. The methods in this paper should be widely applicable in fields beyond astronomy, wherever sample selection effects occur.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2011

Type Ia Supernova Intrinsic Magnitude Dispersion and the Fitting of Cosmological Parameters

I present an analysis for fitting cosmological parameters from a Hubble Diagram of a standard candle with unknown intrinsic magnitude dispersion. The dispersion is determined from the data themselves, simultaneously with the cosmological parameters. This contrasts with the strategies used to date. The advantages of the presented analysis are that it is done in a single fit (it is not iterative), it provides a statistically founded and unbiased estimate of the intrinsic dispersion, and its cosmological-parameter uncertainties account for the intrinsic dispersion uncertainty. Applied to Type Ia supernovae, my strategy provides a statistical measure to test for sub-types and assess the significance of any magnitude corrections applied to the calibrated candle. Parameter bias and differences between likelihood distributions produced by the presented and currently-used fitters are negligibly small for existing and projected supernova data sets.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2004

Redshift Accuracy Requirements for Future Supernova and Number Count Surveys

We investigate the required redshift accuracy of type Ia supernova and cluster number-count surveys in order for the redshift uncertainties not to contribute appreciably to the dark energy parameter error budget. For the SNAP supernova experiment, we find that, without the assistance of ground-based measurements, individual supernova redshifts would need to be determined to about 0.002 or better, which is a challenging but feasible requirement for a low-resolution spectrograph. However, we find that accurate redshifts for z<0.1 supernovae, obtained with ground-based experiments, are sufficient to immunize the results against even relatively large redshift errors at high z. For the future cluster number-count surveys such as the South Pole Telescope, Planck or DUET, we find that the purely statistical error in photometric redshift is less important, and that the irreducible, systematic bias in redshift drives the requirements. The redshift bias will have to be kept below 0.001-0.005 per redshift bin (which is determined by the filter set), depending on the sky coverage and details of the definition of the minimal mass of the survey. Furthermore, we find that X-ray surveys have a more stringent required redshift accuracy than Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect surveys since they use a shorter lever arm in redshift; conversely, SZ surveys benefit from their high redshift reach only so long as some redshift information is available for distant (z>1) clusters.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2002

K-corrections and Extinction Corrections for Type Ia Supernovae

The measurement of the cosmological parameters from Type Ia supernovae hinges on our ability to compare nearby and distant supernovae accurately. Here we present an advance on a method for performing generalized K-corrections for Type Ia supernovae which allows us to compare these objects from the UV to near-IR over the redshift range 0<z<2. We discuss the errors currently associated with this method and how future data can improve upon it significantly. We also examine the effects of reddening on the K-corrections and the light curves of Type Ia supernovae. Finally, we provide a few examples of how these techniques affect our current understanding of a sample of both nearby and distant supernovae.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2002

Photon vs Energy Magnitude Systems and the Measurement of the Cosmological Parameters

The relative brightnesses of standard candles have long been known to be potentially powerful probes of distance. The distance modulus, the difference between observed and absolute magnitudes, has been associated with the values of the cosmological parameters: Hubble's constant H_0, the mass density Omega_M and the cosmological constant Omega_Lambda. In the literature the relationship between these parameters and the distance modulus is calculated for an energy magnitude system; the Johnson-Cousins magnitude system used in observations is in fact a photon-counting system. In this paper, we present the relation between observed and absolute photon magnitudes in terms of the familiar energy distance modulus and derive the correct form of the K-correction. The differences between energy and photon systems are small relative to the measurement errors of contemporary high-redshift supernova searches. The distinction must be made, however, for precision cosmological measurements such as those planned for Type Ia supernovae.

astro-ph↗

arXiv2001

Using the Supernova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) to Search for Microlensing Events Towards the LMC

Microlensing experiments today have a tantalizing result; they have detected an excess of microlensing events beyond what is expected from known stellar populations. These events could be due to a possible form of Halo dark matter. However, study of these events is limited by their small number and poor photometric precision. The SNAP satellite, which has been proposed to search for supernovae, would be an ideal instrument to search for microlensing events towards the LMC. Due in part to its larger mirror, and largely to its superb space-based seeing and low background, with a modest program SNAP will be able to detect $\sim 250$ microlensing events per year. In addition, SNAP will generate $\sim 16$ high quality events per year with 1% photometric resolution. These data should break the microlensing degeneracy, and determine whether the events are indeed due to dark matter lenses in the Galactic Halo. Side benefits of such a program will include a never before equaled catalog of variable stars in the LMC. On of the most intriguing possibilities is a direct measurement of the distance to the LMC. Such a measurement will determine what is today the most uncertain rung on the distance ladder and thus lock down the Hubble constant.

astro-ph↗

arXiv1995

A Generalized $K$ correction for Type Ia Supernovae: Comparing R-band Photometry Beyond z=0.2 with B, V, and R-band Nearby Photometry

Photometric measurements show that as a group nearby type Ia supernovae follow similar lightcurves and reach similar peak magnitudes Thus, these supernovae can serve as standard candles or calibrated candles at cosmological distances. Magnitudes of local and distant supernovae, both in the same filter band, are compared using a $K$ correction to account for the different spectral regions incident on that filter. A generalized approach compares magnitudes in different bands for the nearby and distant supernova, bands that are selected to give sensitivity in corresponding regions of the redshifted and unredshifted spectra. Thus at a redshift of $z \approx 0.5$, local $B$ magnitudes are compared with distant $R$ magnitudes. We compute these generalized $K$ corrections over a range of redshifts and bandpass pairs and discuss their advantages over the traditional single-band $K$ correction. In particular, errors near maximum light can be kept below 0.05 mag out to at least $z=0.6$, whereas the traditional $K$ correction is difficult to use beyond $z > 0.2$.

astro-ph↗