SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Alex M. Karrila

Publications and source records attributed to Alex M. Karrila.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Logarithmic delocalization of random Lipschitz functions on honeycomb and other lattices

We study random one-Lipschitz integer functions $f$ on the vertices of a finite connected graph, sampled according to the weight $W(f) = \prod_{\langle v, w \rangle \in E} \mathbf{c}^{ \mathbb{I} \{ f(v) = f(w) \} }$ where $\mathbf{c} \geq 1$, and restricted by a boundary condition. For planar graphs, this is arguably the simplest ``2D random walk model'', and proving the convergence of such models to the Gaussian free field (GFF) is a major open question. Our main result is that for subgraphs of the honeycomb lattice (and some other cubic planar lattices), with flat boundary conditions and $1 \leq \mathbf{ c } \leq 2$, such functions exhibit logarithmic variations. This is in line with the GFF prediction and improves a non-quantitative delocalization result by P. Lammers. The proof goes via level-set percolation arguments, including a renormalization inequality and a dichotomy theorem for level-set loops. In another direction, we show that random Lipschitz functions have bounded variance whenever the wired FK-Ising model with $p=1-1/\mathbf{c}$ percolates on the same lattice (corresponding to $\mathbf{c} > 2 + \sqrt{3}$ on the honeycomb lattice). Via a simple coupling, this also implies, perhaps surprisingly, that random homomorphisms are localized on the rhombille lattice.

math.PR

Limits of conformal images and conformal images of limits for planar random curves

We address the scaling limits of random curves arising from, e.g., planar lattice models, especially in rough domains. The well-known precompactness conditions of Kemppainen and Smirnov show that certain crossing probability estimates guarantee the subsequential weak convergence of the random curves in the topology of unparametrized curves, as well as in a topology inherited from the unit disc via conformal maps. We complement this result by proving that proceeding to weak limit commutes with changing topology, i.e., limits of conformal images are conformal images of limits, with minimal boundary regularity assumptions on the domains where the random curves lie. Such rough boundaries are especially interesting if, in the context of multiple random curves, a limit candidate is defined in terms of iterated SLE type processes with $\kappa \in (4, 8)$, and one hence needs to study (boundary-touching) curves in domains slit by other random curves.

math-ph