arXiv subjects

Alexander Golovnev

Publications and source records attributed to Alexander Golovnev.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Sumset Structure in Local Computation

We introduce and study a new model of decision trees that lies at the frontier of provable circuit lower bounds. We study $\ell$-local decision trees, in which each internal node queries an $\ell$-local function of the input. We show that sufficiently strong lower bounds for $\ell$-local decision trees would imply several breakthrough circuit lower bounds, including super-linear size lower bounds for log-depth circuits and improved bounds for unrestricted-depth circuits. Previously, such consequences were known to follow from strong lower bounds for depth-$3$ circuits, which has been the main prior approach in attempting to prove these results. Since local decision trees are strictly weaker than depth-$3$ circuits, this provides a formally easier route to the same circuit lower-bound consequences. We prove essentially optimal lower bounds for a weaker variant that we call oblivious $\ell$-local decision trees, where all nodes at the same depth query the same function. Our lower bounds follow from a new technique that uncovers sumset structure in local maps, and our hard functions are sumset dispersers, sumset condensers, and directional affine dispersers. Along the way, we give an explicit construction of a sumset condenser with small entropy loss. As an additional contribution, we initiate the study of degree-$2$ decision trees, in which each query is a quadratic polynomial of the input. We show that proving lower bounds in this model is a natural stepping stone toward constructing dispersers for degree-$2$ variety sources, which imply improved circuit lower bounds for unrestricted depth circuits. We prove nearly maximal lower bounds for the oblivious variant of the model.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Online Orthogonal Vectors Revisited

We prove new upper and lower bounds for the Online Orthogonal Vectors Problem ($\mathsf{OnlineOV}_{n,d}$). In this problem, a preprocessing algorithm receives $n$ vectors $x_1,\ldots,x_n\in\{0,1\}^d$ and constructs a data structure of size $S$. A query algorithm subsequently receives a query vector $q\in\{0,1\}^d$ and in time $T$ decides whether $q$ is orthogonal to any of the input vectors $x_i$. We design a new deterministic data structure for $\mathsf{OnlineOV}_{n,d}$. In low dimensions ($d = c \log n$), our data structure matches the performance of the best known randomized algorithm due to Chan [SoCG 2017]. Furthermore, in moderate dimensions ($d=n^{\varepsilon}$), we give the first improvement since Charikar, Indyk and Panigrahy [ICALP 2002]. Along the way, we give the first deterministic refutation of a conjecture on the hardness of $\mathsf{OnlineOV}$ posed by Goldstein, Lewenstein and Porat [ISAAC 2017]. This data structure also extends to a number of problems, including Partial Match, Orthogonal Range Search, and DNF Evaluation. We use a novel structure-versus-randomness decomposition to design our algorithm. Under the Non-Uniform Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis, we also prove arbitrarily large polynomial space lower bounds for any $\mathsf{OnlineOV}$ data structure with sublinear query time even with computationally unbounded preprocessing. These lower bounds extend to several other problems, including Polynomial Evaluation, Partial Match, Orthogonal Range Search, and Approximate Nearest Neighbors. We also prove similar lower bounds for $\mathsf{3-SUM}$ with preprocessing under the Non-Uniform Hamiltonian Path Conjecture.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Improved Time-Space Tradeoffs for 3SUM-Indexing

3SUM-Indexing is a preprocessing variant of the 3SUM problem that has recently received a lot of attention. The best known time-space tradeoff for the problem is $T S^3 = n^{6}$ (up to logarithmic factors), where $n$ is the number of input integers, $S$ is the length of the preprocessed data structure, and $T$ is the running time of the query algorithm. This tradeoff was achieved in [KP19, GGHPV20] using the Fiat-Naor generic algorithm for Function Inversion. Consequently, [GGHPV20] asked whether this algorithm can be improved by leveraging the structure of 3SUM-Indexing. In this paper, we exploit the structure of 3SUM-Indexing to give a time-space tradeoff of $T S = n^{2.5}$, which is better than the best known one in the range $n^{3/2} \ll S \ll n^{7/4}$. We further extend this improvement to the $k$SUM-Indexing problem-a generalization of 3SUM-Indexing-and to the related $k$XOR-Indexing problem, where addition is replaced with XOR. we improve the known time-space tradeoff for the Jumbled Indexing problem, which is a well-known data structure problem related to 3SUM-Indexing. Our improvement comes from an alternative way to apply the Fiat-Naor algorithm to 3SUM-Indexing. Specifically, we exploit the structure of the function to be inverted by decomposing it into "sub-functions" with certain properties. This allows us to apply an improvement to the Fiat-Naor algorithm (which is not directly applicable to 3SUM-Indexing), obtained in [GGPS23] in a much larger range of parameters. We believe that our techniques may be useful in additional application-dependent optimizations of the Fiat-Naor algorithm.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Linear Space Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximating CSPs

We consider the approximability of constraint satisfaction problems in the streaming setting. For every constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) on $n$ variables taking values in $\{0,\ldots,q-1\}$, we prove that improving over the trivial approximability by a factor of $q$ requires $Ω(n)$ space even on instances with $O(n)$ constraints. We also identify a broad subclass of problems for which any improvement over the trivial approximability requires $Ω(n)$ space. The key technical core is an optimal, $q^{-(k-1)}$-inapproximability for the Max $k$-LIN-$\bmod\; q$ problem, which is the Max CSP problem where every constraint is given by a system of $k-1$ linear equations $\bmod\; q$ over $k$ variables. Our work builds on and extends the breakthrough work of Kapralov and Krachun (Proc. STOC 2019) who showed a linear lower bound on any non-trivial approximation of the MaxCut problem in graphs. MaxCut corresponds roughly to the case of Max $k$-LIN-$\bmod\; q$ with ${k=q=2}$. For general CSPs in the streaming setting, prior results only yielded $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ space bounds. In particular no linear space lower bound was known for an approximation factor less than $1/2$ for any CSP. Extending the work of Kapralov and Krachun to Max $k$-LIN-$\bmod\; q$ to $k>2$ and $q>2$ (while getting optimal hardness results) is the main technical contribution of this work. Each one of these extensions provides non-trivial technical challenges that we overcome in this work.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Output-Sparse Matrix Multiplication Using Compressed Sensing

We give two algorithms for output-sparse matrix multiplication (OSMM), the problem of multiplying two $n \times n$ matrices $A, B$ when their product $AB$ is promised to have at most $O(n^δ)$ many non-zero entries for a given value $δ\in [0, 2]$. We then show how to speed up these algorithms in the fully sparse setting, where the input matrices $A, B$ are themselves sparse. All of our algorithms work over arbitrary rings. Our first, deterministic algorithm for OSMM works via a two-pass reduction to compressed sensing. It runs in roughly $n^{ω(δ/2, 1, 1)}$ time, where $ω(\cdot, \cdot, \cdot)$ is the rectangular matrix multiplication exponent. This substantially improves on prior deterministic algorithms for output-sparse matrix multiplication. Our second, randomized algorithm for OSMM works via a reduction to compressed sensing and a variant of matrix multiplication verification, and runs in roughly $n^{ω(δ- 1, 1, 1)}$ time. This algorithm and its extension to the fully sparse setting have running times that match those of the (randomized) algorithms for OSMM and FSMM, respectively, in recent work of Abboud, Bringmann, Fischer, and Künnemann (SODA, 2024). Our algorithm uses different techniques and is arguably simpler. Finally, we observe that the running time of our randomized algorithm and the algorithm of Abboud et al. are optimal via a simple reduction from rectangular matrix multiplication.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Difficulties Constructing Lattices with Exponential Kissing Number from Codes

In this note, we present examples showing that several natural ways of constructing lattices from error-correcting codes do not in general yield a correspondence between minimum-weight non-zero codewords and shortest non-zero lattice vectors. From these examples, we conclude that the main results in two works of Vlăduţ (Moscow J. Comb. Number Th., 2019 and Discrete Comput. Geom., 2021) on constructing lattices with exponential kissing number from error-correcting codes are invalid. A more recent preprint (arXiv, 2024) that Vlăduţ posted after an initial version of this work was made public is also invalid. Exhibiting a family of lattices with exponential kissing number therefore remains an open problem (as of July 2025).

math.MG↗

arXiv2024

Matrix Multiplication Verification Using Coding Theory

We study the Matrix Multiplication Verification Problem (MMV) where the goal is, given three $n \times n$ matrices $A$, $B$, and $C$ as input, to decide whether $AB = C$. A classic randomized algorithm by Freivalds (MFCS, 1979) solves MMV in $\widetilde{O}(n^2)$ time, and a longstanding challenge is to (partially) derandomize it while still running in faster than matrix multiplication time (i.e., in $o(n^ω)$ time). To that end, we give two algorithms for MMV in the case where $AB - C$ is sparse. Specifically, when $AB - C$ has at most $O(n^δ)$ non-zero entries for a constant $0 \leq δ< 2$, we give (1) a deterministic $O(n^{ω- \varepsilon})$-time algorithm for constant $\varepsilon = \varepsilon(δ) > 0$, and (2) a randomized $\widetilde{O}(n^2)$-time algorithm using $δ/2 \cdot \log_2 n + O(1)$ random bits. The former algorithm is faster than the deterministic algorithm of Künnemann (ESA, 2018) when $δ\geq 1.056$, and the latter algorithm uses fewer random bits than the algorithm of Kimbrel and Sinha (IPL, 1993), which runs in the same time and uses $\log_2 n + O(1)$ random bits (in turn fewer than Freivalds's algorithm). We additionally study the complexity of MMV. We first show that all algorithms in a natural class of deterministic linear algebraic algorithms for MMV (including ours) require $Ω(n^ω)$ time. We also show a barrier to proving a super-quadratic running time lower bound for matrix multiplication (and hence MMV) under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). Finally, we study relationships between natural variants and special cases of MMV (with respect to deterministic $\widetilde{O}(n^2)$-time reductions).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Hilbert Functions and Low-Degree Randomness Extractors

For $S\subseteq \mathbb{F}^n$, consider the linear space of restrictions of degree-$d$ polynomials to $S$. The Hilbert function of $S$, denoted $\mathrm{h}_S(d,\mathbb{F})$, is the dimension of this space. We obtain a tight lower bound on the smallest value of the Hilbert function of subsets $S$ of arbitrary finite grids in $\mathbb{F}^n$ with a fixed size $|S|$. We achieve this by proving that this value coincides with a combinatorial quantity, namely the smallest number of low Hamming weight points in a down-closed set of size $|S|$. Understanding the smallest values of Hilbert functions is closely related to the study of degree-$d$ closure of sets, a notion introduced by Nie and Wang (Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 2015). We use bounds on the Hilbert function to obtain a tight bound on the size of degree-$d$ closures of subsets of $\mathbb{F}_q^n$, which answers a question posed by Doron, Ta-Shma, and Tell (Computational Complexity, 2022). We use the bounds on the Hilbert function and degree-$d$ closure of sets to prove that a random low-degree polynomial is an extractor for samplable randomness sources. Most notably, we prove the existence of low-degree extractors and dispersers for sources generated by constant-degree polynomials and polynomial-size circuits. Until recently, even the existence of arbitrary deterministic extractors for such sources was not known.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Sketching approximability of all finite CSPs

A constraint satisfaction problem (CSP), $\textsf{Max-CSP}(\mathcal{F})$, is specified by a finite set of constraints $\mathcal{F} \subseteq \{[q]^k \to \{0,1\}\}$ for positive integers $q$ and $k$. An instance of the problem on $n$ variables is given by $m$ applications of constraints from $\mathcal{F}$ to subsequences of the $n$ variables, and the goal is to find an assignment to the variables that satisfies the maximum number of constraints. In the $(γ,β)$-approximation version of the problem for parameters $0 \leq β< γ\leq 1$, the goal is to distinguish instances where at least $γ$ fraction of the constraints can be satisfied from instances where at most $β$ fraction of the constraints can be satisfied. In this work we consider the approximability of this problem in the context of sketching algorithms and give a dichotomy result. Specifically, for every family $\mathcal{F}$ and every $β< γ$, we show that either a linear sketching algorithm solves the problem in polylogarithmic space, or the problem is not solvable by any sketching algorithm in $o(\sqrt{n})$ space. In particular, we give non-trivial approximation algorithms using polylogarithmic space for infinitely many constraint satisfaction problems. We also extend previously known lower bounds for general streaming algorithms to a wide variety of problems, and in particular the case of $q=k=2$, where we get a dichotomy, and the case when the satisfying assignments of the constraints of $\mathcal{F}$ support a distribution on $[q]^k$ with uniform marginals. Prior to this work, other than sporadic examples, the only systematic classes of CSPs that were analyzed considered the setting of Boolean variables $q=2$, binary constraints $k=2$, singleton families $|\mathcal{F}|=1$ and only considered the setting where constraints are placed on literals rather than variables.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

Range Avoidance for Constant-Depth Circuits: Hardness and Algorithms

Range Avoidance (AVOID) is a total search problem where, given a Boolean circuit $C\colon\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^m$, $m>n$, the task is to find a $y\in\{0,1\}^m$ outside the range of $C$. For an integer $k\geq 2$, $\mathrm{NC}^0_k$-AVOID is a special case of AVOID where each output bit of $C$ depends on at most $k$ input bits. While there is a very natural randomized algorithm for AVOID, a deterministic algorithm for the problem would have many interesting consequences. Ren, Santhanam, and Wang (FOCS 2022) and Guruswami, Lyu, and Wang (RANDOM 2022) proved that explicit constructions of functions of high formula complexity, rigid matrices, and optimal linear codes, reduce to $\mathrm{NC}^0_4$-AVOID, thus establishing conditional hardness of the $\mathrm{NC}^0_4$-AVOID problem. On the other hand, $\mathrm{NC}^0_2$-AVOID admits polynomial-time algorithms, leaving the question about the complexity of $\mathrm{NC}^0_3$-AVOID open. We give the first reduction of an explicit construction question to $\mathrm{NC}^0_3$-AVOID. Specifically, we prove that a polynomial-time algorithm (with an $\mathrm{NP}$ oracle) for $\mathrm{NC}^0_3$-AVOID for the case of $m=n+n^{2/3}$ would imply an explicit construction of a rigid matrix, and, thus, a super-linear lower bound on the size of log-depth circuits. We also give deterministic polynomial-time algorithms for all $\mathrm{NC}^0_k$-AVOID problems for $m\geq n^{k-1}/\log(n)$. Prior work required an $\mathrm{NP}$ oracle, and required larger stretch, $m \geq n^{k-1}$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2022

Quantum Worst-Case to Average-Case Reductions for All Linear Problems

We study the problem of designing worst-case to average-case reductions for quantum algorithms. For all linear problems, we provide an explicit and efficient transformation of quantum algorithms that are only correct on a small (even sub-constant) fraction of their inputs into ones that are correct on all inputs. This stands in contrast to the classical setting, where such results are only known for a small number of specific problems or restricted computational models. En route, we obtain a tight $Ω(n^2)$ lower bound on the average-case quantum query complexity of the Matrix-Vector Multiplication problem. Our techniques strengthen and generalise the recently introduced additive combinatorics framework for classical worst-case to average-case reductions (STOC 2022) to the quantum setting. We rely on quantum singular value transformations to construct quantum algorithms for linear verification in superposition and learning Bogolyubov subspaces from noisy quantum oracles. We use these tools to prove a quantum local correction lemma, which lies at the heart of our reductions, based on a noise-robust probabilistic generalisation of Bogolyubov's lemma from additive combinatorics.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Polynomial formulations as a barrier for reduction-based hardness proofs

The Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) asserts that for every $\varepsilon>0$ there exists $k$ such that $k$-SAT requires time $(2-\varepsilon)^n$. The field of fine-grained complexity has leveraged SETH to prove quite tight conditional lower bounds for dozens of problems in various domains and complexity classes, including Edit Distance, Graph Diameter, Hitting Set, Independent Set, and Orthogonal Vectors. Yet, it has been repeatedly asked in the literature whether SETH-hardness results can be proven for other fundamental problems such as Hamiltonian Path, Independent Set, Chromatic Number, MAX-$k$-SAT, and Set Cover. In this paper, we show that fine-grained reductions implying even $λ^n$-hardness of these problems from SETH for any $λ>1$, would imply new circuit lower bounds: super-linear lower bounds for Boolean series-parallel circuits or polynomial lower bounds for arithmetic circuits (each of which is a four-decade open question). We also extend this barrier result to the class of parameterized problems. Namely, for every $λ>1$ we conditionally rule out fine-grained reductions implying SETH-based lower bounds of $λ^k$ for a number of problems parameterized by the solution size $k$. Our main technical tool is a new concept called polynomial formulations. In particular, we show that many problems can be represented by relatively succinct low-degree polynomials, and that any problem with such a representation cannot be proven SETH-hard (without proving new circuit lower bounds).

cs.CC↗

arXiv2022

Lattice Problems Beyond Polynomial Time

We study the complexity of lattice problems in a world where algorithms, reductions, and protocols can run in superpolynomial time, revisiting four foundational results: two worst-case to average-case reductions and two protocols. We also show a novel protocol. 1. We prove that secret-key cryptography exists if $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$-approximate SVP is hard for $2^{\varepsilon n}$-time algorithms. I.e., we extend to our setting (Micciancio and Regev's improved version of) Ajtai's celebrated polynomial-time worst-case to average-case reduction from $\widetilde{O}(n)$-approximate SVP to SIS. 2. We prove that public-key cryptography exists if $\widetilde{O}(n)$-approximate SVP is hard for $2^{\varepsilon n}$-time algorithms. This extends to our setting Regev's celebrated polynomial-time worst-case to average-case reduction from $\widetilde{O}(n^{1.5})$-approximate SVP to LWE. In fact, Regev's reduction is quantum, but ours is classical, generalizing Peikert's polynomial-time classical reduction from $\widetilde{O}(n^2)$-approximate SVP. 3. We show a $2^{\varepsilon n}$-time coAM protocol for $O(1)$-approximate CVP, generalizing the celebrated polynomial-time protocol for $O(\sqrt{n/\log n})$-CVP due to Goldreich and Goldwasser. These results show complexity-theoretic barriers to extending the recent line of fine-grained hardness results for CVP and SVP to larger approximation factors. (This result also extends to arbitrary norms.) 4. We show a $2^{\varepsilon n}$-time co-non-deterministic protocol for $O(\sqrt{\log n})$-approximate SVP, generalizing the (also celebrated!) polynomial-time protocol for $O(\sqrt{n})$-CVP due to Aharonov and Regev. 5. We give a novel coMA protocol for $O(1)$-approximate CVP with a $2^{\varepsilon n}$-time verifier. All of the results described above are special cases of more general theorems that achieve time-approximation factor tradeoffs.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2022

Derandomization of Cell Sampling

Since 1989, the best known lower bound on static data structures was Siegel's classical cell sampling lower bound. Siegel showed an explicit problem with $n$ inputs and $m$ possible queries such that every data structure that answers queries by probing $t$ memory cells requires space $s\geq\widetildeΩ\left(n\cdot(\frac{m}{n})^{1/t}\right)$. In this work, we improve this bound for non-adaptive data structures to $s\geq\widetildeΩ\left(n\cdot(\frac{m}{n})^{1/(t-1)}\right)$ for all $t \geq 2$. For $t=2$, we give a lower bound of $s>m-o(m)$, improving on the bound $s>m/2$ recently proved by Viola over $\mathbb{F}_2$ and Siegel's bound $s\geq\widetildeΩ(\sqrt{mn})$ over other finite fields.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Sketching Approximability of (Weak) Monarchy Predicates

We analyze the sketching approximability of constraint satisfaction problems on Boolean domains, where the constraints are balanced linear threshold functions applied to literals. In~particular, we explore the approximability of monarchy-like functions where the value of the function is determined by a weighted combination of the vote of the first variable (the president) and the sum of the votes of all remaining variables. The pure version of this function is when the president can only be overruled by when all remaining variables agree. For every $k \geq 5$, we show that CSPs where the underlying predicate is a pure monarchy function on $k$ variables have no non-trivial sketching approximation algorithm in $o(\sqrt{n})$ space. We also show infinitely many weaker monarchy functions for which CSPs using such constraints are non-trivially approximable by $O(\log(n))$ space sketching algorithms. Moreover, we give the first example of sketching approximable asymmetric Boolean CSPs. Our results work within the framework of Chou, Golovnev, Sudan, and Velusamy (FOCS 2021) that characterizes the sketching approximability of all CSPs. Their framework can be applied naturally to get a computer-aided analysis of the approximability of any specific constraint satisfaction problem. The novelty of our work is in using their work to get an analysis that applies to infinitely many problems simultaneously.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2022

Worst-Case to Average-Case Reductions via Additive Combinatorics

We present a new framework for designing worst-case to average-case reductions. For a large class of problems, it provides an explicit transformation of algorithms running in time $T$ that are only correct on a small (subconstant) fraction of their inputs into algorithms running in time $\widetilde{O}(T)$ that are correct on all inputs. Using our framework, we obtain such efficient worst-case to average-case reductions for fundamental problems in a variety of computational models; namely, algorithms for matrix multiplication, streaming algorithms for the online matrix-vector multiplication problem, and static data structures for all linear problems as well as for the multivariate polynomial evaluation problem. Our techniques crucially rely on additive combinatorics. In particular, we show a local correction lemma that relies on a new probabilistic version of the quasi-polynomial Bogolyubov-Ruzsa lemma.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Approximability of all Boolean CSPs with linear sketches

In this work we consider the approximability of $\textsf{Max-CSP}(f)$ in the context of sketching algorithms and completely characterize the approximability of all Boolean CSPs. Specifically, given $f$, $γ$ and $β$ we show that either (1) the $(γ,β)$-approximation version of $\textsf{Max-CSP}(f)$ has a linear sketching algorithm using $O(\log n)$ space, or (2) for every $ε> 0$ the $(γ-ε,β+ε)$-approximation version of $\textsf{Max-CSP}(f)$ requires $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ space for any sketching algorithm. We also prove lower bounds against streaming algorithms for several CSPs. In particular, we recover the streaming dichotomy of [CGV20] for $k=2$ and show streaming approximation resistance of all CSPs for which $f^{-1}(1)$ supports a distribution with uniform marginals. Our positive results show wider applicability of bias-based algorithms used previously by [GVV17] and [CGV20] by giving a systematic way to discover biases. Our negative results combine the Fourier analytic methods of [KKS15], which we extend to a wider class of CSPs, with a rich collection of reductions among communication complexity problems that lie at the heart of the negative results.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2021

Fine-grained hardness of CVP(P) -- Everything that we can prove (and nothing else)

We show a number of fine-grained hardness results for the Closest Vector Problem in the $\ell_p$ norm ($\mathrm{CVP}_p$), and its approximate and non-uniform variants. First, we show that $\mathrm{CVP}_p$ cannot be solved in $2^{(1-\varepsilon)n}$ time for all $p \notin 2\mathbb{Z}$ and $\varepsilon > 0$, assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). Second, we extend this by showing that there is no $2^{(1-\varepsilon)n}$-time algorithm for approximating $\mathrm{CVP}_p$ to within a constant factor $γ$ for such $p$ assuming a "gap" version of SETH, with an explicit relationship between $γ$, $p$, and the arity $k = k(\varepsilon)$ of the underlying hard CSP. Third, we show the same hardness result for (exact) $\mathrm{CVP}_p$ with preprocessing (assuming non-uniform SETH). For exact "plain" $\mathrm{CVP}_p$, the same hardness result was shown in [Bennett, Golovnev, and Stephens-Davidowitz FOCS 2017] for all but finitely many $p \notin 2\mathbb{Z}$, where the set of exceptions depended on $\varepsilon$ and was not explicit. For the approximate and preprocessing problems, only very weak bounds were known prior to this work. We also show that the restriction to $p \notin 2\mathbb{Z}$ is in some sense inherent. In particular, we show that no "natural" reduction can rule out even a $2^{3n/4}$-time algorithm for $\mathrm{CVP}_2$ under SETH. For this, we prove that the possible sets of closest lattice vectors to a target in the $\ell_2$ norm have quite rigid structure, which essentially prevents them from being as expressive as $3$-CNFs. We prove these results using techniques from many different fields, including complex analysis, functional analysis, additive combinatorics, and discrete Fourier analysis. E.g., along the way, we give a new (and tighter) proof of Szemerédi's cube lemma for the boolean cube.

cs.CC↗