arXiv subjects

Alexander Mathiesen-Ohman

Publications and source records attributed to Alexander Mathiesen-Ohman.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A Decentralized Frontier AI Architecture Based on Personal Instances, Synthetic Data, and Collective Context Synchronization

Recent progress in artificial intelligence has been driven largely by the scaling of centralized large language models through increased parameters, datasets, and computational resources. While effective, this paradigm introduces structural constraints related to compute concentration, energy consumption, data availability, and governance. This paper proposes an alternative architectural approach through the H3LIX Decentralized Frontier Model Architecture (DFMA), a distributed AI framework in which locally operating AI instances generate synthetic learning signals derived from reasoning processes and interactions. These signals are aggregated within a shared contextual substrate termed the Collective Context Field (CCF), which conditions reasoning behavior across the network without requiring direct parameter synchronization. By enabling contextual signal propagation rather than centralized retraining at every iteration, the architecture can be designed to support privacy-preserving collective learning under explicit assumptions, while facilitating distributed sharing of learned abstractions. The system further integrates Energy-Adaptive Model Evolution, aligning learning activities with renewable energy availability to support more sustainable AI infrastructure. Conceptually, the architecture reframes artificial intelligence as a distributed cognitive system analogous to biological neural networks, in which intelligence emerges from the interaction of many locally adaptive agents within a shared contextual environment. Together, these mechanisms suggest a new scaling pathway for artificial intelligence systems based on distributed contextual learning and collective experience accumulation.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Rogue Variable Theory: A Quantum-Compatible Cognition Framework with a Rosetta Stone Alignment Algorithm

Many of the most consequential dynamics in human cognition occur \emph{before} events become explicit: before decisions are finalized, emotions are labeled, or meanings stabilize into narrative form. These pre-event states are characterized by ambiguity, contextual tension, and competing latent interpretations. Rogue Variable Theory (RVT) formalizes such states as \emph{Rogue Variables}: structured, pre-event cognitive configurations that influence outcomes while remaining unresolved or incompatible with a system's current representational manifold. We present a quantum-consistent information-theoretic implementation of RVT based on a time-indexed \emph{Mirrored Personal Graph} (MPG) embedded into a fixed graph Hilbert space, a normalized \emph{Quantum MPG State} (QMS) constructed from node and edge metrics under context, Hamiltonian dynamics derived from graph couplings, and an error-weighted `rogue operator'' whose principal eigenvectors identify rogue factor directions and candidate Rogue Variable segments. We further introduce a \emph{Rosetta Stone Layer} (RSL) that maps user-specific latent factor coordinates into a shared reference Hilbert space to enable cross-user comparison and aggregation without explicit node alignment. The framework is fully implementable on classical systems and does not assume physical quantum processes; \emph{collapse} is interpreted as informational decoherence under interaction, often human clarification.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2025

Managing Ambiguity: A Proof of Concept of Human-AI Symbiotic Sense-making based on Quantum-Inspired Cognitive Mechanism of Rogue Variable Detection

Organizations increasingly operate in environments characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA), where early indicators of change often emerge as weak, fragmented signals. Although artificial intelligence (AI) is widely used to support managerial decision-making, most AI-based systems remain optimized for prediction and resolution, leading to premature interpretive closure under conditions of high ambiguity. This creates a gap in management science regarding how human-AI systems can responsibly manage ambiguity before it crystallizes into error or crisis. This study addresses this gap by presenting a proof of concept (PoC) of the LAIZA human-AI augmented symbiotic intelligence system and its patented process: Systems and Methods for Quantum-Inspired Rogue Variable Modeling (QRVM), Human-in-the-Loop Decoherence, and Collective Cognitive Inference. The mechanism operationalizes ambiguity as a non-collapsed cognitive state, detects persistent interpretive breakdowns (rogue variables), and activates structured human-in-the-loop clarification when autonomous inference becomes unreliable. Empirically, the article draws on a three-month case study conducted in 2025 within the AI development, involving prolonged ambiguity surrounding employee intentions and intellectual property boundaries. The findings show that preserving interpretive plurality enabled early scenario-based preparation, including proactive patent protection, allowing decisive and disruption-free action once ambiguity collapsed. The study contributes to management theory by reframing ambiguity as a first-class construct and demonstrates the practical value of human-AI symbiosis for organizational resilience in VUCA environments.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Person-AI Bidirectional Fit - A Proof-Of-Concept Case Study Of Augmented Human-Ai Symbiosis In Management Decision-Making Process

This article develops the concept of Person-AI bidirectional fit, defined as the continuously evolving, context-sensitive alignment-primarily cognitive, but also emotional and behavioral-between a human decision-maker and an artificial intelligence system. Grounded in contingency theory and quality theory, the study examines the role of P-AI fit in managerial decision-making through a proof-of-concept case study involving a real hiring process for a Senior AI Lead. Three decision pathways are compared: (1) independent evaluations by a CEO, CTO, and CSO; (2) an evaluation produced by an augmented human-AI symbiotic intelligence system (H3LIX-LAIZA); and (3) an assessment generated by a general-purpose large language model. The results reveal substantial role-based divergence in human judgments, high alignment between H3LIX-LAIZA and the CEOs implicit decision model-including ethical disqualification of a high-risk candidate and a critical false-positive recommendation from the LLMr. The findings demonstrate that higher P-AI fit, exemplified by the CEO H3LIX-LAIZA relationship, functions as a mechanism linking augmented symbiotic intelligence to accurate, trustworthy, and context-sensitive decisions. The study provides an initial verification of the P-AI fit construct and a proof-of-concept for H3LIX-LAIZA as an augmented human-AI symbiotic intelligence system.

cs.HC↗