arXiv subjects

Alexander Vaschillo

Publications and source records attributed to Alexander Vaschillo.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

Fault-tolerant quantum computation with a neutral atom processor

Quantum computing experiments are transitioning from running on physical qubits to using encoded, logical qubits. Fault-tolerant computation can identify and correct errors, and has the potential to enable the dramatically reduced logical error rates required for valuable algorithms. However, it requires flexible control of high-fidelity operations performed on large numbers of qubits. We demonstrate fault-tolerant quantum computation on a quantum processor with 256 qubits, each an individual neutral Ytterbium atom. The operations are designed so that key error sources convert to atom loss, which can be detected by imaging. Full connectivity is enabled by atom movement. We demonstrate the entanglement of 24 logical qubits encoded into 48 atoms, at once catching errors and correcting for, on average 1.8, lost atoms. We also implement the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm with up to 28 logical qubits encoded into 112 atoms, showing better-than-physical error rates. In both cases, "erasure conversion," changing errors into a form that can be detected independently from qubit state, improves circuit performance. These results begin to clear a path for achieving scientific quantum advantage with a programmable neutral atom quantum processor.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

How to choose a decoder for a fault-tolerant quantum computer? The speed vs accuracy trade-off

Achieving practical quantum advantage requires a classical decoding algorithm to identify and correct faults during computation. This classical decoding algorithm must deliver both accuracy and speed, but in what combination? When is a decoder "fast enough" or "accurate enough"? In the case of surface codes, tens of decoding algorithms have been proposed, with different accuracies and speeds. However, it has been unclear how to choose the best decoder for a given quantum architecture. Should a faster decoder be used at the price of reduced accuracy? Or should a decoder sacrifice accuracy to fit within a given time constraint? If a decoder is too slow, it may be stopped upon reaching a time bound, at the price of some time-out failures and an increased failure rate. What then is the optimal stopping time of the decoder? By analyzing the speed vs. accuracy tradeoff, we propose strategies to select the optimal stopping time for a decoder for different tasks. We design a protocol to select the decoder that minimizes the spacetime cost per logical gate, for logical computation of a given depth. Our protocol enables comparison of different decoders, and the selection of an appropriate decoder for a given fault-tolerant quantum computing architecture. We illustrate our protocol for the surface code equipped with a desktop implementation of the PyMatching decoder. We estimate PyMatching is fast enough to implement thousands of logical gates with a better accuracy than physical qubits. However, we find it is not sufficiently fast to reach 10^5 logical gates, under certain assumptions, due to the decoding delay which forces qubits to idle and accumulate errors while idling. We expect further improvements to PyMatching are possible by running it on a better machine or by reducing the OS interference.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Assessing requirements to scale to practical quantum advantage

While quantum computers promise to solve some scientifically and commercially valuable problems thought intractable for classical machines, delivering on this promise will require a large-scale quantum machine. Understanding the impact of architecture design choices for a scaled quantum stack for specific applications, prior to full realization of the quantum system, is an important open challenge. To this end, we develop a framework for quantum resource estimation, abstracting the layers of the stack, to estimate resources required across these layers for large-scale quantum applications. Using a tool that implements this framework, we assess three scaled quantum applications and find that hundreds of thousands to millions of physical qubits are needed to achieve practical quantum advantage. We identify three qubit parameters, namely size, speed, and controllability, that are critical at scale to rendering these applications practical. A goal of our work is to accelerate progress towards practical quantum advantage by enabling the broader community to explore design choices across the stack, from algorithms to qubits.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

QParallel: Explicit Parallelism for Programming Quantum Computers

We present a language extension for parallel quantum programming to (1) remove ambiguities concerning parallelism in current quantum programming languages and (2) facilitate space-time tradeoff investigations in quantum computing. While the focus of similar libraries in the domain of classical computing (OpenMP, OpenACC, etc.) is to divide a computation into multiple threads, the main goal of QParallel is to keep the compiler and the runtime system from introducing parallelism-inhibiting dependencies, e.g., through reuse of qubits in automatic qubit management. We describe the syntax and semantics of the proposed language extension, implement a prototype based on Q#, and present several examples and use cases to illustrate its performance benefits. Moreover, we introduce a tool that guides programmers in the placement of parallel regions by identifying the subroutines that profit most from parallelization, which is especially useful if the programmer's knowledge of the source code is limited. Support for QParallel can be added to any multithreading library and language extension, including OpenMP and OpenACC.

quant-ph↗