SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Alexander Yakovenko

Publications and source records attributed to Alexander Yakovenko.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

FreeFlow: A Bias-free Hierarchical Transformer for Optical Flow Estimation

Optical flow methods typically rely on task-specific inductive biases, such as correlation volumes, feature warping, and iterative refinement, among others, to reach high accuracy. While effective, such biases constrain the model to predefined heuristics, which can limit its expressivity and lead to more complex pipelines and additional computational cost. We present FreeFlow, a hierarchical transformer built without any flow-specific components, using instead a single feed-forward encoder--decoder. FreeFlow combines three attention variants: window attention for local processing, shifted-window attention for cross-window information exchange, and a global attention operating at a reduced resolution. The resulting architecture scales naturally with model capacity, enabling a consistent accuracy gain from small to large variants. Despite the absence of standard inductive biases, FreeFlow achieves state-of-the-art results on major benchmarks, including Sintel (0.68/1.48 EPE on Clean/Final), KITTI-2015 (3.23 Fl-all), and Spring (3.192 1px), while remaining memory efficient at 1080p inference.

cs.CV

AIM 2025 Low-light RAW Video Denoising Challenge: Dataset, Methods and Results

This paper reviews the AIM 2025 (Advances in Image Manipulation) Low-Light RAW Video Denoising Challenge. The task is to develop methods that denoise low-light RAW video by exploiting temporal redundancy while operating under exposure-time limits imposed by frame rate and adapting to sensor-specific, signal-dependent noise. We introduce a new benchmark of 756 ten-frame sequences captured with 14 smartphone camera sensors across nine conditions (illumination: 1/5/10 lx; exposure: 1/24, 1/60, 1/120 s), with high-SNR references obtained via burst averaging. Participants process linear RAW sequences and output the denoised 10th frame while preserving the Bayer pattern. Submissions are evaluated on a private test set using full-reference PSNR and SSIM, with final ranking given by the mean of per-metric ranks. This report describes the dataset, challenge protocol, and submitted approaches.

cs.CV

MEMFOF: High-Resolution Training for Memory-Efficient Multi-Frame Optical Flow Estimation

Recent advances in optical flow estimation have prioritized accuracy at the cost of growing GPU memory consumption, particularly for high-resolution (FullHD) inputs. We introduce MEMFOF, a memory-efficient multi-frame optical flow method that identifies a favorable trade-off between multi-frame estimation and GPU memory usage. Notably, MEMFOF requires only 2.09 GB of GPU memory at runtime for 1080p inputs, and 28.5 GB during training, which uniquely positions our method to be trained at native 1080p without the need for cropping or downsampling. We systematically revisit design choices from RAFT-like architectures, integrating reduced correlation volumes and high-resolution training protocols alongside multi-frame estimation, to achieve state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks while substantially reducing memory overhead. Our method outperforms more resource-intensive alternatives in both accuracy and runtime efficiency, validating its robustness for flow estimation at high resolutions. At the time of submission, our method ranks first on the Spring benchmark with a 1-pixel (1px) outlier rate of 3.289, leads Sintel (clean) with an endpoint error (EPE) of 0.963, and achieves the best Fl-all error on KITTI-2015 at 2.94%. The code is available at https://github.com/msu-video-group/memfof.

cs.CV

Objective video quality metrics application to video codecs comparisons: choosing the best for subjective quality estimation

Quality assessment plays a key role in creating and comparing video compression algorithms. Despite the development of a large number of new methods for assessing quality, generally accepted and well-known codecs comparisons mainly use the classical methods like PSNR, SSIM and new method VMAF. These methods can be calculated following different rules: they can use different frame-by-frame averaging techniques or different summation of color components. In this paper, a fundamental comparison of various versions of generally accepted metrics is carried out to find the most relevant and recommended versions of video quality metrics to be used in codecs comparisons. For comparison, we used a set of videos encoded with video codecs of different standards, and visual quality scores collected for the resulting set of streams since 2018 until 2021

cs.MM