Alexandre Rocchi | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

From Local Geometry to Global Pseudo Labeling for Robust Positive Unlabeled Learning under Covariate Shift

Detecting covariate shift is critical for building reliable vision systems. While most prior work focuses on improving robustness to shift, explicitly detecting covariate shift remains underexplored. Existing approaches typically rely on fully supervised training, requiring labeled examples from both original and shifted distributions, which is often impractical. In this paper, we show that covariate shift detection can be effectively addressed with weaker supervision using Positive Unlabeled (PU) learning. However, under covariate shift, in distribution and shifted data overlap significantly, making classical PU methods unstable and sensitive to noise. To overcome this challenge, we introduce Spectral PU Neighborhood Annotation (SPUNA), a geometry aware framework that progressively discovers shifted data by leveraging the local manifold structure of visual features. Extensive experiments show that SPUNA achieves state of the art performance in PU settings and remarkably matches the performances of fully supervised methods. Moreover, our approach transfers robustly across different types of shifts, demonstrating strong generalization capabilities. Code is available at https://github.com/fira7s/S-PUNA

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

A Geometric Unification of Concept Learning with Concept Cones

Two traditions of interpretability have evolved side by side but seldom spoken to each other: Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs), which prescribe what a concept should be, and Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs), which discover what concepts emerge. While CBMs use supervision to align activations with human-labeled concepts, SAEs rely on sparse coding to uncover emergent ones. We show that both paradigms instantiate the same geometric structure: each learns a set of linear directions in activation space whose nonnegative combinations form a concept cone. Supervised and unsupervised methods thus differ not in kind but in how they select this cone. Building on this view, we propose an operational bridge between the two paradigms. CBMs provide human-defined reference geometries, while SAEs can be evaluated by how well their learned cones approximate or contain those of CBMs. This containment framework yields quantitative metrics linking inductive biases -- such as SAE type, sparsity, or expansion ratio -- to emergence of plausible\footnote{We adopt the terminology of \citet{jacovi2020towards}, who distinguish between faithful explanations (accurately reflecting model computations) and plausible explanations (aligning with human intuition and domain knowledge). CBM concepts are plausible by construction -- selected or annotated by humans -- though not necessarily faithful to the true latent factors that organise the data manifold.} concepts. Using these metrics, we uncover a ``sweet spot'' in both sparsity and expansion factor that maximizes both geometric and semantic alignment with CBM concepts. Overall, our work unifies supervised and unsupervised concept discovery through a shared geometric framework, providing principled metrics to measure SAE progress and assess how well discovered concept align with plausible human concepts.

cs.AI↗