arXiv subjects

Ali Abbasian Ardakani

Publications and source records attributed to Ali Abbasian Ardakani.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

From Density to Biopsy Decisions and Malignancy Prediction: A Benchmark Study of Multimodal Large Language Models Against Radiologists in Digital and Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

Purpose: To compare four multimodal large language models (MLLMs) with radiologists of varying expertise in breast density assessment, BI-RADS assessment, biopsy candidacy determination, and continuous malignancy probability estimation using digital mammography (DM) and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). Methods: This study included 179 women with paired DM/CEM examinations and reference standards. Four MLLMs (ChatGPT-5.2, Gemini-3.1 Pro, Sonnet-4.6, Muse Spark) interpreted images with and without masks; three radiologists interpreted non-masked images. Results: For binary density classification on DM, radiologist accuracies ranged from 55.81% to 78.60%, exceeding most MLLM values (62.33%-71.63%), while masks added limited benefit. Five-category BI-RADS accuracies were higher for radiologists on DM (56.74-67.44%) and CEM (62.33-82.79%) compared with MLLMs (DM 31.16-45.12%; CEM 40.00-55.81%). Binary biopsy-candidacy accuracies were likewise higher for radiologists (DM 85.12-89.77%; CEM 86.98-92.09%) than for MLLMs (DM 61.39-75.35%; CEM 69.30-82.79%), although CEM improved performance across all readers. Lesion masks substantially improved MLLM continuous malignancy-probability accuracies from 64.65%-71.63% to 72.56-78.60% on DM and from 67.91%-77.21% to 72.56%-81.86% on CEM, approaching radiologist ranges (DM 63.72-82.79%; CEM 81.86-88.84%). The corresponding AUCs for the top masked models overlapped those of the human readers. Overall, Muse Spark, followed by Sonnet-4.6, demonstrated the strongest performance among the MLLMs across domains. Conclusion: Radiologists generally outperformed MLLMs in categorical tasks, while selected masked models approached human performance for continuous malignancy probability estimation, suggesting a potential adjunctive role.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Less Contouring, More Accuracy: Lesion-Guided ROI Deep Learning for Ovarian Ultrasound Classification

Ovarian lesion classification using transvaginal ultrasound remains challenging due to overlapping imaging characteristics and the dependence on expert interpretation. This study investigates whether lesion-guided region-of-interest (ROI) deep learning can achieve competitive diagnostic performance while reducing the annotation burden associated with pixel-level lesion segmentation. Two publicly available ovarian ultrasound datasets were evaluated: the Multi-Modality Ovarian Tumor Ultrasound (MMOTU) dataset for eight-class classification and the Ovarian Ultrasound Dataset (OUD) for binary classification. Four strategies were compared under a unified framework: global image-based deep learning, lesion-guided ROI-based deep learning, lesion contour-based deep learning, and contour-based radiomics with machine learning classifiers. Four deep learning architectures, MaxViT-Tiny, Swin Transformer, EfficientNet-B7, and ResNet18, were evaluated. Radiomics models were developed using support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and artificial neural network classifiers, with ANOVA-based feature selection applied for the lower-sample OUD dataset. The lesion-guided ROI strategy achieved the strongest overall performance, with MaxViT-Tiny obtaining 93.10% accuracy and an AUC of 0.99 on MMOTU and 97.56% accuracy and an AUC of 0.99 on OUD. The contour-based approach achieved comparable accuracy but required substantially higher annotation effort. These findings demonstrate that lesion-guided ROI deep learning provides an effective balance between diagnostic performance and annotation efficiency, offering a practical approach for scalable AI-assisted ovarian ultrasound analysis

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

CBCT-IQ: A Publicly Available Annotated Cone-Beam CT Dataset for Image Quality Assessment and Benchmarking

Medical image quality plays a critical role in diagnostic accuracy, especially in X-ray-based imaging modalities such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), where image quality must be balanced against radiation dose. While expert visual evaluation remains the clinical standard for image quality evaluation, it is time-consuming, subjective and affected by inter-observer variability, emphasizing the need for reliable quantitative image quality assessment (IQA) methods. However, the development and validation of such IQA methods have been limited by the lack of publicly available CBCT datasets with expert image quality annotations. In this study, we provide the first open-access CBCT IQA dataset containing 1,764 annotated image slices acquired using systematic variations in image acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Three clinical experts graded the overall image quality and a predefined regions of interest (ROI) using a four-level scoring scheme. In addition, we benchmark 26 full reference- and no reference-based IQA measures against expert annotations and introduce an exploratory IQA measure-based ranking capable of distinguishing subtle image quality differences. This dataset introduced a standardized benchmark for future CBCT IQA research and provides a valuable resource for the development and validation of new IQA methods, enabling reproducible research and advancing CBCT IQA.

physics.med-ph↗

arXiv2026

A deep learning pipeline for PAM50 subtype classification using histopathology images and multi-objective patch selection

Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease with diverse molecular profiles. The PAM50 gene signature is widely recognized as a standard for classifying breast cancer into intrinsic subtypes, enabling more personalized treatment strategies. In this study, we introduce a novel optimization-driven deep learning framework that aims to reduce reliance on costly molecular assays by directly predicting PAM50 subtypes from H&E-stained whole-slide images (WSIs). Our method jointly optimizes patch informativeness, spatial diversity, uncertainty, and patch count by combining the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) with Monte Carlo dropout-based uncertainty estimation. The proposed method can identify a small but highly informative patch subset for classification. We used a ResNet18 backbone for feature extraction and a custom CNN head for classification. For evaluation, we used the internal TCGA-BRCA dataset as the training cohort and the external CPTAC-BRCA dataset as the test cohort. On the internal dataset, an F1-score of 0.8812 and an AUC of 0.9841 using 627 WSIs from the TCGA-BRCA cohort were achieved. The performance of the proposed approach on the external validation dataset showed an F1-score of 0.7952 and an AUC of 0.9512. These findings indicate that the proposed optimization-guided, uncertainty-aware patch selection can achieve high performance and improve the computational efficiency of histopathology-based PAM50 classification compared to existing methods, suggesting a scalable imaging-based replacement that has the potential to support clinical decision-making.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Ultrasound-based detection and malignancy prediction of breast lesions eligible for biopsy: A multi-center clinical-scenario study using nomograms, large language models, and radiologist evaluation

To develop and externally validate integrated ultrasound nomograms combining BIRADS features and quantitative morphometric characteristics, and to compare their performance with expert radiologists and state of the art large language models in biopsy recommendation and malignancy prediction for breast lesions. In this retrospective multicenter, multinational study, 1747 women with pathologically confirmed breast lesions underwent ultrasound across three centers in Iran and Turkey. A total of 10 BIRADS and 26 morphological features were extracted from each lesion. A BIRADS, morphometric, and fused nomogram integrating both feature sets was constructed via logistic regression. Three radiologists (one senior, two general) and two ChatGPT variants independently interpreted deidentified breast lesion images. Diagnostic performance for biopsy recommendation (BIRADS 4,5) and malignancy prediction was assessed in internal and two external validation cohorts. In pooled analysis, the fused nomogram achieved the highest accuracy for biopsy recommendation (83.0%) and malignancy prediction (83.8%), outperforming the morphometric nomogram, three radiologists and both ChatGPT models. Its AUCs were 0.901 and 0.853 for the two tasks, respectively. In addition, the performance of the BIRADS nomogram was significantly higher than the morphometric nomogram, three radiologists and both ChatGPT models for biopsy recommendation and malignancy prediction. External validation confirmed the robust generalizability across different ultrasound platforms and populations. An integrated BIRADS morphometric nomogram consistently outperforms standalone models, LLMs, and radiologists in guiding biopsy decisions and predicting malignancy. These interpretable, externally validated tools have the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies and enhance personalized decision making in breast imaging.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2026

Developing Predictive and Robust Radiomics Models for Chemotherapy Response in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

Objectives: High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage with extensive peritoneal metastases, making treatment challenging. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is often used to reduce tumor burden before surgery, but about 40% of patients show limited response. Radiomics, combined with machine learning (ML), offers a promising non-invasive method for predicting NACT response by analyzing computed tomography (CT) imaging data. This study aimed to improve response prediction in HGSOC patients undergoing NACT by integration different feature selection methods. Materials and methods: A framework for selecting robust radiomics features was introduced by employing an automated randomisation algorithm to mimic inter-observer variability, ensuring a balance between feature robustness and prediction accuracy. Four response metrics were used: chemotherapy response score (CRS), RECIST, volume reduction (VolR), and diameter reduction (DiaR). Lesions in different anatomical sites were studied. Pre- and post-NACT CT scans were used for feature extraction and model training on one cohort, and an independent cohort was used for external testing. Results: The best prediction performance was achieved using all lesions combined for VolR prediction, with an AUC of 0.83. Omental lesions provided the best results for CRS prediction (AUC 0.77), while pelvic lesions performed best for DiaR (AUC 0.76). Conclusion: The integration of robustness into the feature selection processes ensures the development of reliable models and thus facilitates the implementation of the radiomics models in clinical applications for HGSOC patients. Future work should explore further applications of radiomics in ovarian cancer, particularly in real-time clinical settings.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

From ACR O-RADS 2022 to Explainable Deep Learning: Comparative Performance of Expert Radiologists, Convolutional Neural Networks, Vision Transformers, and Fusion Models in Ovarian Masses

Background: The 2022 update of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound classification refines risk stratification for adnexal lesions, yet human interpretation remains subject to variability and conservative thresholds. Concurrently, deep learning (DL) models have demonstrated promise in image-based ovarian lesion characterization. This study evaluates radiologist performance applying O-RADS v2022, compares it to leading convolutional neural network (CNN) and Vision Transformer (ViT) models, and investigates the diagnostic gains achieved by hybrid human-AI frameworks. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, a total of 512 adnexal mass images from 227 patients (110 with at least one malignant cyst) were included. Sixteen DL models, including DenseNets, EfficientNets, ResNets, VGGs, Xception, and ViTs, were trained and validated. A hybrid model integrating radiologist O-RADS scores with DL-predicted probabilities was also built for each scheme. Results: Radiologist-only O-RADS assessment achieved an AUC of 0.683 and an overall accuracy of 68.0%. CNN models yielded AUCs of 0.620 to 0.908 and accuracies of 59.2% to 86.4%, while ViT16-384 reached the best performance, with an AUC of 0.941 and an accuracy of 87.4%. Hybrid human-AI frameworks further significantly enhanced the performance of CNN models; however, the improvement for ViT models was not statistically significant (P-value >0.05). Conclusions: DL models markedly outperform radiologist-only O-RADS v2022 assessment, and the integration of expert scores with AI yields the highest diagnostic accuracy and discrimination. Hybrid human-AI paradigms hold substantial potential to standardize pelvic ultrasound interpretation, reduce false positives, and improve detection of high-risk lesions.

cs.CV↗