Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Ali Dehghan

Publications and source records attributed to Ali Dehghan.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The inapproximability for the (0,1)-additive number

An {\it additive labeling} of a graph $G$ is a function $ \ell :V(G) \rightarrow\mathbb{N}$, such that for every two adjacent vertices $ v $ and $ u$ of $ G $, $ \sum_{w \sim v}\ell(w)\neq \sum_{w \sim u}\ell(w) $ ($ x \sim y $ means that $ x $ is joined to $y$). The {\it additive number} of $ G $, denoted by $η(G)$, is the minimum number $k $ such that $ G $ has a additive labeling $ \ell :V(G) \rightarrow \mathbb{N}_k$. The {\it additive choosability} of a graph $G$, denoted by $η_{\ell}(G) $, is the smallest number $k$ such that $G$ has an additive labeling for any assignment of lists of size $k$ to the vertices of $G$, such that the label of each vertex belongs to its own list. Seamone (2012) \cite{a80} conjectured that for every graph $G$, $η(G)= η_{\ell}(G)$. We give a negative answer to this conjecture and we show that for every $k$ there is a graph $G$ such that $ η_{\ell}(G)- η(G) \geq k$. A {\it $(0,1)$-additive labeling} of a graph $G$ is a function $ \ell :V(G) \rightarrow\{0,1\}$, such that for every two adjacent vertices $ v $ and $ u$ of $ G $, $ \sum_{w \sim v}\ell(w)\neq \sum_{w \sim u}\ell(w) $. A graph may lack any $(0,1)$-additive labeling. We show that it is $ \mathbf{NP} $-complete to decide whether a $(0,1)$-additive labeling exists for some families of graphs such as perfect graphs and planar triangle-free graphs. For a graph $G$ with some $(0,1)$-additive labelings, the $(0,1)$-additive number of $G$ is defined as $ σ_{1} (G) = \min_{\ell \in Γ}\sum_{v\in V(G)}\ell(v) $ where $Γ$ is the set of $(0,1)$-additive labelings of $G$. We prove that given a planar graph that admits a $(0,1)$-additive labeling, for all $ \varepsilon >0 $, approximating the $(0,1)$-additive number within $ n^{1-\varepsilon} $ is $ \mathbf{NP} $-hard.

math.CO↗

Upper bounds for the 2-hued chromatic number of graphs in terms of the independence number

A 2-hued coloring of a graph $G$ (also known as conditional $(k, 2)$-coloring and dynamic coloring) is a coloring such that for every vertex $v\in V(G)$ of degree at least $2$, the neighbors of $v$ receive at least $2$ colors. The smallest integer $k$ such that $G$ has a 2-hued coloring with $ k $ colors, is called the {\it 2-hued chromatic number} of $G$ and denoted by $χ_2(G)$. In this paper, we will show that if $G$ is a regular graph, then $ χ_{2}(G)- χ(G) \leq 2 \log _{2}(α(G)) +\mathcal{O}(1) $ and if $G$ is a graph and $δ(G)\geq 2$, then $ χ_{2}(G)- χ(G) \leq 1+\lceil \sqrt[δ-1]{4Δ^{2}} \rceil ( 1+ \log _{\frac{2Δ(G)}{2Δ(G)-δ(G)}} (α(G)) ) $ and in general case if $G$ is a graph, then $ χ_{2}(G)- χ(G) \leq 2+ \min \lbrace α^{\prime}(G),\frac{α(G)+ω(G)}{2}\rbrace $.

math.CO↗

On the complexity of deciding whether the regular number is at most two

The regular number of a graph G denoted by reg(G) is the minimum number of subsets into which the edge set of G can be partitioned so that the subgraph induced by each subset is regular. In this work we answer to the problem posed as an open problem in A. Ganesan et al. (2012) [3] about the complexity of determining the regular number of graphs. We show that computation of the regular number for connected bipartite graphs is NP-hard. Furthermore, we show that, determining whether reg(G) = 2 for a given connected 3-colorable graph G is NP-complete. Also, we prove that a new variant of the Monotone Not-All-Equal 3-Sat problem is NP-complete.

math.CO↗

The Complexity of the Proper Orientation Number

Graph orientation is a well-studied area of graph theory. A proper orientation of a graph $G = (V,E)$ is an orientation $D$ of $E(G)$ such that for every two adjacent vertices $ v $ and $ u $, $ d^{-}_{D}(v) \neq d^{-}_{D}(u)$ where $d_{D}^{-}(v)$ is the number of edges with head $v$ in $D$. The proper orientation number of $G$ is defined as $ \overrightarrowχ (G) =\displaystyle \min_{D\in Γ} \displaystyle\max_{v\in V(G)} d^{-}_{D}(v) $ where $Γ$ is the set of proper orientations of $G$. We have $ χ(G)-1 \leq \overrightarrowχ (G)\leq Δ(G) $. We show that, it is $ \mathbf{NP} $-complete to decide whether $\overrightarrowχ(G)=2$, for a given planar graph $G$. Also, we prove that there is a polynomial time algorithm for determining the proper orientation number of 3-regular graphs. In sharp contrast, we will prove that this problem is $ \mathbf{NP} $-hard for 4-regular graphs.

cs.CC↗

On Rainbow Connection of Strongly Regular Graphs

An edge-colored graph $G$ is rainbow connected if any two vertices are connected by a path whose edges have distinct colors. The rainbow connection number of a connected graph $G$, denoted $rc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow connected. We prove if $G$ is a connected strongly $r$-regular graph and $r\geq 600$, then $rc(G)\leq3$. Specially, there is a constant $c$ such that $rc(G)\leq c$ for any connected strongly regular graph $G$.

math.CO↗

On the Lucky labeling of Graphs

Suppose the vertices of a graph $G$ were labeled arbitrarily by positive integers, and let $Sum(v)$ denote the sum of labels over all neighbors of vertex $v$. A labeling is lucky if the function $Sum$ is a proper coloring of $G$, that is, if we have $Sum(u) \neq Sum(v)$ whenever $u$ and $v$ are adjacent. The least integer $k$ for which a graph $G$ has a lucky labeling from the set $\lbrace 1, 2, ...,k\rbrace$ is the lucky number of $G$, denoted by $η(G)$. We will prove, for every graph $G$ other than $ K_{2} $, $\frac{w}{n-w+1}\leqη(G) \leq Δ^{2} $ and we present an algorithm for lucky labeling of $ G $.

math.CO↗