Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Aliénor Goubault-Larrecq

Publications and source records attributed to Aliénor Goubault-Larrecq.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Complexity lower bounds for succinct binary structures of bounded clique-width with restrictions

We present a Rice-like complexity lower bound for any MSO-definable problem on binary structures succinctly encoded by circuits. This work extends the framework recently developed as a counterpoint to Courcelle's theorem for graphs encoded by circuits, in two interplaying directions: (1) by allowing multiple binary relations, and (2) by restricting the interpretation of new symbols. Depending on the pair of an MSO problem $ψ$ and an MSO restriction $χ$, the problem is proven to be NP-hard or coNP-hard or P-hard, as long as $ψ$ is non-trivial on structures satisfying $χ$ with bounded clique-width. Indeed, there are P-complete problems (for logspace reductions) in our extended context. Finally, we strengthen a previous result on the necessity to parameterize the notion of non-triviality, hence supporting the choice of clique-width.

cs.CC↗

Hardness of monadic second-order formulae over succinct graphs

Our main result is a succinct counterpoint to Courcelle's meta-theorem as follows: every cw-nontrivial monadic second-order (MSO) property is either NP-hard or coNP-hard over graphs given by succinct representations. Succint representations are Boolean circuits computing the adjacency relation. Cw-nontrivial properties are those which have infinitely many models and infinitely many countermodels with bounded cliquewidth. Moreover, we explore what happens when the cw-nontriviality condition is dropped and show that, under a reasonable complexity assumption, the previous dichotomy fails, even for questions expressible in first-order logic.

cs.CC↗

Rice-like complexity lower bounds for Boolean and uniform automata networks

Automata networks are a versatile model of finite discrete dynamical systems composed of interacting entities (the automata), able to embed any directed graph as a dynamics on its space of configurations (the set of vertices, representing all the assignments of a state to each entity). In this world, virtually any question is decidable by a simple exhaustive search. We lever the Rice-like complexity lower bound, stating that any non-trivial monadic second order logic question on the graph of its dynamics is NP-hard or coNP-hard (given the automata network description), to bounded alphabets (including the Boolean case). This restriction is particularly meaningful for applications to "complex systems", where each entity has a restricted set of possible states (its alphabet). For the deterministic case, trivial questions are solvable in constant time, hence there is a sharp gap in complexity for the algorithmic solving of concrete problems on them. For the non-deterministic case, non-triviality is defined at bounded cliquewidth, which offers a structure to establish metatheorems of complexity lower bounds.

cs.DM↗

Circuit metaconstruction in logspace for Rice-like complexity lower bounds in ANs and SGRs

A new proof technique combining finite model theory and dynamical systems has recently been introduced to obtain general complexity lower bounds on any question one may formulate on the dynamics (seen as a graph) of a given automata network (AN). ANs are abstract finite dynamical systems of interacting entities whose evolution rules are encoded as circuits, hence the study also applies to succinct graph representations (SGRs). In this article, we detail the construction of circuits to obtain general complexity lower bounds (metareduction) and show that the reduction is feasible in logarithmic space.

cs.CC↗

New Algorithms for Combinations of Objectives using Separating Automata

The notion of separating automata was introduced by Bojanczyk and Czerwinski for understanding the first quasipolynomial time algorithm for parity games. In this paper we show that separating automata is a powerful tool for constructing algorithms solving games with combinations of objectives. We construct two new algorithms: the first for disjunctions of parity and mean payoff objectives, matching the best known complexity, and the second for disjunctions of mean payoff objectives, improving on the state of the art. In both cases the algorithms are obtained through the construction of small separating automata, using as black boxes the existing constructions for parity objectives and for mean payoff objectives.

cs.GT↗