arXiv subjects

Alina A. von Davier

Publications and source records attributed to Alina A. von Davier.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Stochastic Constrained Test Assembly for AI-Enabled Assessment Systems

Test assembly, the process of constructing a complete test form from an item pool subject to blueprint constraints, has traditionally been treated as a static optimization problem. In AI-enabled assessment environments, however, item pools evolve continuously as newly generated items enter with uncertain psychometric parameters, and delivery is on demand. These conditions make test assembly a sequential decision-making problem under uncertainty: which form should be deployed now, given current but incomplete knowledge of item quality, to simultaneously maximize measurement precision, satisfy content-blueprint constraints, maintain pool sustainability, and accelerate calibration of uncertain new items? This paper proposes the Stochastic Constrained Hybrid (SCH) framework as a principled answer to this question. SCH recasts form-level assembly as a multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem with Fisher information as the reward, extending recent item-level approaches in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the form-level setting. A simulation study comparing six test assembly methods is also presented. The main contribution of this paper is a framework for incorporating items with uncertain parameters into the automatic test assembly process for linear test forms.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2026

Analytics for Quality Assurance for Item Pools (AQuAP): Monitoring and Maintaining Item Bank Health in AI-Driven Assessment Systems

The large-scale digitization of educational assessment has made the continuous oversight of item banks both essential and complex. This paper presents Analytics for Quality Assurance for Item Pools (AQuAP), a dashboard environment for monitoring item quality and item bank health. AQuAP supports the operational implementation of the large scale item generation procedures for high-stakes tests as included in the Item Factory, a framework for automated and human-supported test development. The paper describes AQuAP in relationship with the process of item development, outlines the broader metric framework for item-pool quality assurance, and highlights the Effective Bank Size (EBS) as one central indicator of pool vitality. EBS quantifies how many independent test sessions can be constructed before content repetition occurs and, when coupled with exposure and usage metrics, provides insight into item bank security, diversity, and efficiency. We further introduce bank-health metrics, such as maximum exposure, maximum conditional exposure, adjusted effective bank size, and the rarely-administered fraction, all of which extend this picture of item utilization. AQuAP illustrates how operational analytics can translate psychometric concepts into quality assurance tools for high-volume, AI-enabled testing programs. This work is illustrated with the Duolingo English Test (DET) processes.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2026

S2A3: Thompson Sampling and Stochastic Exposure Control for High-Stakes CATs

High-stakes computerized adaptive tests (CATs) require a continuous supply of calibrated items, yet traditional item piloting is slow, expensive, and operationally hazardous. We introduce the S2A3 framework -- Soft Scoring (S2) and Adaptive Adaptive Administration (A3) -- which unifies item calibration and test administration into a single online process. Thompson sampling enhances item selection by drawing provisional parameters from each item's posterior distribution and selecting the item maximizing expected Fisher information, naturally routing uncertain items to informative test-takers while maintaining measurement precision. Soft scoring integrates over parameter uncertainty so that incompletely calibrated items exert appropriately attenuated influence on ability estimates. A stochastic variant of Sympson-Hetter exposure control balances measurement efficiency against bank security via a tunable temperature parameter and item-specific weights. We validate S2A3 on Yes/No Vocabulary and Vocabulary-in-Context tasks from the Duolingo English Test, demonstrating rapid item calibration and preserved scoring reliability even when cold-start items constitute a significant fraction of the active pool.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2024

BanditCAT and AutoIRT: Machine Learning Approaches to Computerized Adaptive Testing and Item Calibration

In this paper, we present a complete framework for quickly calibrating and administering a robust large-scale computerized adaptive test (CAT) with a small number of responses. Calibration - learning item parameters in a test - is done using AutoIRT, a new method that uses automated machine learning (AutoML) in combination with item response theory (IRT), originally proposed in [Sharpnack et al., 2024]. AutoIRT trains a non-parametric AutoML grading model using item features, followed by an item-specific parametric model, which results in an explanatory IRT model. In our work, we use tabular AutoML tools (AutoGluon.tabular, [Erickson et al., 2020]) along with BERT embeddings and linguistically motivated NLP features. In this framework, we use Bayesian updating to obtain test taker ability posterior distributions for administration and scoring. For administration of our adaptive test, we propose the BanditCAT framework, a methodology motivated by casting the problem in the contextual bandit framework and utilizing item response theory (IRT). The key insight lies in defining the bandit reward as the Fisher information for the selected item, given the latent test taker ability from IRT assumptions. We use Thompson sampling to balance between exploring items with different psychometric characteristics and selecting highly discriminative items that give more precise information about ability. To control item exposure, we inject noise through an additional randomization step before computing the Fisher information. This framework was used to initially launch two new item types on the DET practice test using limited training data. We outline some reliability and exposure metrics for the 5 practice test experiments that utilized this framework.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2024

Responsible AI for Test Equity and Quality: The Duolingo English Test as a Case Study

Artificial intelligence (AI) creates opportunities for assessments, such as efficiencies for item generation and scoring of spoken and written responses. At the same time, it poses risks (such as bias in AI-generated item content). Responsible AI (RAI) practices aim to mitigate risks associated with AI. This chapter addresses the critical role of RAI practices in achieving test quality (appropriateness of test score inferences), and test equity (fairness to all test takers). To illustrate, the chapter presents a case study using the Duolingo English Test (DET), an AI-powered, high-stakes English language assessment. The chapter discusses the DET RAI standards, their development and their relationship to domain-agnostic RAI principles. Further, it provides examples of specific RAI practices, showing how these practices meaningfully address the ethical principles of validity and reliability, fairness, privacy and security, and transparency and accountability standards to ensure test equity and quality.

cs.CY↗