SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Alon Danai

Publications and source records attributed to Alon Danai.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Generalizing OOOOOOB

We present three versions of the classic two-pile game \textsc{one-or-one-or-one-of-both} generalized to the multi-pile context. In each case, we explore the resulting $\mathcal{P}$-positions. In the first version, there is a simple pattern. In the other two versions, we find partial solutions in each case through two experimental routes. First by limiting the number of piles, then by limiting the number of tokens per pile.

math.CO

Two Dimensional Subtraction -- Transfer Games

We generalize the results and conjectures of Tam\'{a}s Lengyel, showing that the \textsc{nim}-values of a large class of two-dimensional subtraction-transfer games are periodic. These are impartial, normal-play games with two piles of tokens, where players alternate either taking some tokens from a pile or transferring tokens from one pile to the other. In many cases, we calculate the exact period. We also develop several new notions of periodicitiy.

math.CO

Grid designs

We define a grid graph $G$ as a Cartesian product of path-graphs $P_n$ or cycle-graphs $C_n$ as shown in Figure 1, and we ask, when can the edge set of a complete graph be expressed as a disjoint union of graphs isomorphic to $G$? That is, we are asking for which grid graphs a $G$-design exists, where a $G$-design is defined as a decomposition of a complete graph into edge-disjoint subgraphs isomorphic to $G$. We show that when $n$ is an odd prime or the square of an odd prime, the toroidal grid-graph $G = C_n \square C_n$ admits a $G$-design. In the less symmetrical case of products of path-graphs, we prove that $G = P_3 \square P_3$ does not admit a $G$-design but that $G = P_4 \square P_4$ does. This last result is the special case that motivated the present paper: a $P_4 \square P_4$-design corresponds to a way of successively scrambling a Connections puzzle so that each pair of words occurs adjacently exactly once. Our constructions use the arithmetic of finite fields.

math.CO