SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Amanda Fajardo

Publications and source records attributed to Amanda Fajardo.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Cosmological Perturbation Theory in $f(Q,T)$ Gravity

We developed the cosmological linear theory of perturbations for $f(Q,T)$ gravity, which is an extension of symmetric teleparallel gravity, with $Q$ the non-metricity and $T$ the trace of the stress-energy tensor. By considering an ansatz of $f(Q,T)=f_1(Q)+f_2(T)$, which has been broadly studied in the literature and the coincident gauge where the connection vanishes, we got equations consistent with $f(Q)$ gravity when $f_{T}=0$. In the case of the tensor perturbations, the propagation of gravitational waves was found to be identical to $f(Q)$, as expected. For scalar perturbations, outside the limit $f_T = 0$, we got that the coupling between $Q$ and $T$ in the Lagrangian produces a coupling between the perturbation of the density and the pressure. The presence of $T$ in the Lagrangian breaks the equation of the conservation of energy, which in turn breaks the standard $ρ' + 3\mathcal{H} (ρ+p) = 0$ relation. We also derived a coupled system of differential equations between $δ$, the density contrast and $v$ in the $\mathcal{H}<<k$ limit and with negligible time derivative of the scalar perturbation potentials, which will be useful in future studies to see whether this class of theories constitute a good alternative to dark matter. These results might also enable to test $f(Q,T)$ gravity with CMB and standard siren data that will help to determine if these models can reduce the Hubble constant tension and if they can constitute an alternative to the $Λ$CDM model.

gr-qc

Fitting $f(Q,T)$ gravity models with a $Λ$CDM limit using H(z) and Pantheon data

We proposed five $f(Q,T)$ models, which are an extension of symmetric teleparallel gravity, where $Q$ is the non-metricity and $T$ is the trace of the stress-energy tensor. By taking specific values of their parameters, these models have a $Λ$CDM limit. Using cosmic chronometers and supernovae Ia data, we found that our models are consistent with $Λ$CDM at a 95\% confidence level. To see whether one of these models can challenge $Λ$CDM at a background perspective, we computed the Bayesian evidence for them and $Λ$CDM. According to it, the concordance model is preferred over four of them, showing a weak preference against $f(Q,T) = -Q/G_N + bT$ and $f(Q,T) = -(Q+2Λ)/G_N +bT$, a substantial preference against $f(Q,T) = -(Q+2 H_0^2 c (Q/(6H_0^2))^{n+1})/G_N + bT $, and a strong preference against $f(Q,T) = -(Q+2H_0^2c(Q/(6H_0^2))^{n+1} + 2Λ)/G_N + bT$. Interestingly, a model includying a $T^2$ dependence ($f(Q,T) = -(Q+2Λ)/G_N - ((16π)^2 G_N b)/(120 H_0^2) T^2$) showed a {substantial} preference against $Λ$CDM. {Therefore, we encourage further analyses of this model to test its viability outside the background perspective.}

gr-qc