Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Amaury Pouly

Publications and source records attributed to Amaury Pouly.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Computational complexity of solving polynomial differential equations over unbounded domains with non-rational coefficients

In this note, we extend the result of \cite{PoulyG16} about the complexity of solving polynomial differential equations over unbounded domains to work with non-rational input. In order to deal with arbitrary input, we phrase the result in framework of Conputable Analysis \cite{Ko91}. As a side result, we also get a uniform result about complexity of the operator, and not just about the solution.

cs.CC↗

Solvability of Matrix-Exponential Equations

We consider a continuous analogue of Babai et al.'s and Cai et al.'s problem of solving multiplicative matrix equations. Given $k+1$ square matrices $A_{1}, \ldots, A_{k}, C$, all of the same dimension, whose entries are real algebraic, we examine the problem of deciding whether there exist non-negative reals $t_{1}, \ldots, t_{k}$ such that \begin{align*} \prod \limits_{i=1}^{k} \exp(A_{i} t_{i}) = C . \end{align*} We show that this problem is undecidable in general, but decidable under the assumption that the matrices $A_{1}, \ldots, A_{k}$ commute. Our results have applications to reachability problems for linear hybrid automata. Our decidability proof relies on a number of theorems from algebraic and transcendental number theory, most notably those of Baker, Kronecker, Lindemann, and Masser, as well as some useful geometric and linear-algebraic results, including the Minkowski-Weyl theorem and a new (to the best of our knowledge) result about the uniqueness of strictly upper triangular matrix logarithms of upper unitriangular matrices. On the other hand, our undecidability result is shown by reduction from Hilbert's Tenth Problem.

cs.DM↗

Computational complexity of solving polynomial differential equations over unbounded domains

In this paper we investigate the computational complexity of solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) $y^{\prime}=p(y)$ over \emph{unbounded time domains}, where $p$ is a vector of polynomials. Contrarily to the bounded (compact) time case, this problem has not been well-studied, apparently due to the "intuition" that it can always be reduced to the bounded case by using rescaling techniques. However, as we show in this paper, rescaling techniques do not seem to provide meaningful insights on the complexity of this problem, since the use of such techniques introduces a dependence on parameters which are hard to compute. We present algorithms which numerically solve these ODEs over unbounded time domains. These algorithms have guaranteed accuracy, i.e. given some arbitrarily large time $t$ and error bound $\varepsilon$ as input, they will output a value $\tilde{y}$ which satisfies $\|y(t)-\tilde{y}\|\leq\varepsilon$. We analyze the complexity of these algorithms and show that they compute $\tilde{y}$ in time polynomial in several quantities including the time $t$, the accuracy of the output $\varepsilon$ and the length of the curve $y$ from $0$ to $t$, assuming it exists until time $t$. We consider both algebraic complexity and bit complexity.

cs.CC↗

Polynomial Time corresponds to Solutions of Polynomial Ordinary Differential Equations of Polynomial Length

We provide an implicit characterization of polynomial time computation in terms of ordinary differential equations: we characterize the class $\operatorname{PTIME}$ of languages computable in polynomial time in terms of differential equations with polynomial right-hand side. This result gives a purely continuous (time and space) elegant and simple characterization of $\operatorname{PTIME}$. This is the first time such classes are characterized using only ordinary differential equations. Our characterization extends to functions computable in polynomial time over the reals in the sense of computable analysis. This extends to deterministic complexity classes above polynomial time. This may provide a new perspective on classical complexity, by giving a way to define complexity classes, like $\operatorname{PTIME}$, in a very simple way, without any reference to a notion of (discrete) machine. This may also provide ways to state classical questions about computational complexity via ordinary differential equations, i.e.~by using the framework of analysis.

cs.CC↗

Turing machines can be efficiently simulated by the General Purpose Analog Computer

The Church-Turing thesis states that any sufficiently powerful computational model which captures the notion of algorithm is computationally equivalent to the Turing machine. This equivalence usually holds both at a computability level and at a computational complexity level modulo polynomial reductions. However, the situation is less clear in what concerns models of computation using real numbers, and no analog of the Church-Turing thesis exists for this case. Recently it was shown that some models of computation with real numbers were equivalent from a computability perspective. In particular it was shown that Shannon's General Purpose Analog Computer (GPAC) is equivalent to Computable Analysis. However, little is known about what happens at a computational complexity level. In this paper we shed some light on the connections between this two models, from a computational complexity level, by showing that, modulo polynomial reductions, computations of Turing machines can be simulated by GPACs, without the need of using more (space) resources than those used in the original Turing computation, as long as we are talking about bounded computations. In other words, computations done by the GPAC are as space-efficient as computations done in the context of Computable Analysis.

cs.CC↗

On the complexity of solving initial value problems

In this paper we prove that computing the solution of an initial-value problem $\dot{y}=p(y)$ with initial condition $y(t_0)=y_0\in\R^d$ at time $t_0+T$ with precision $e^{-μ}$ where $p$ is a vector of polynomials can be done in time polynomial in the value of $T$, $μ$ and $Y=\sup_{t_0\leqslant u\leqslant T}\infnorm{y(u)}$. Contrary to existing results, our algorithm works for any vector of polynomials $p$ over any bounded or unbounded domain and has a guaranteed complexity and precision. In particular we do not assume $p$ to be fixed, nor the solution to lie in a compact domain, nor we assume that $p$ has a Lipschitz constant.

math.NA↗